-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 757
[css-snappoints] Initial spec merge, starting with the simple stuff :) #88
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…n terms of that. Removing resolved issues. No functional changes.
…fy box which I think was just accidentally omitted from the alternate proposal since there is prose referring to a specified box.
…percentage behavior as compared to proposal in a manner that I think is consistent with its intent. Needs a definition for what the property defines, but avoiding 'snap viewport' for the time being since 'viewport' isn't an accurate descriptor of the feature and the term 'viewport' is already overloaded. Will add an alternative term and definition later.
…compared to proposal per teleconf with Tab and Elika. Diverging from proposal to change specification of axes to physical to match the other properties, but also adding an issue to discuss this further.
… snap position link to definition rather than inline for now (may merge the definition inline later).
…ewport in overview and an explicit definition.
…ination definitions. Updating example markup to use new syntax is still TBD
…p viewport', since it seems more descriptive of what it does and avoids the vague 'viewport'.
…so bikeshed will build.
…er to be less ambiguous
…esolution blocked on closure of the snap-axis question.
…stency; snap positions is defined but snap points is not. Leaving shortname/url/title/issue tracking for now so I don't mess anything up but they should change too.
ChumpChief
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 11, 2016
[css-snappoints] Initial spec merge, starting with the simple stuff :)
birtles
added a commit
to birtles/csswg-drafts
that referenced
this pull request
Dec 4, 2017
This resolves w3c#88
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
No description provided.