Skip to content

Conversation

@ChumpChief
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

…n terms of that. Removing resolved issues. No functional changes.
…fy box which I think was just accidentally omitted from the alternate proposal since there is prose referring to a specified box.
…percentage behavior as compared to proposal in a manner that I think is consistent with its intent. Needs a definition for what the property defines, but avoiding 'snap viewport' for the time being since 'viewport' isn't an accurate descriptor of the feature and the term 'viewport' is already overloaded. Will add an alternative term and definition later.
…compared to proposal per teleconf with Tab and Elika. Diverging from proposal to change specification of axes to physical to match the other properties, but also adding an issue to discuss this further.
… snap position link to definition rather than inline for now (may merge the definition inline later).
…ewport in overview and an explicit definition.
…ination definitions. Updating example markup to use new syntax is still TBD
…p viewport', since it seems more descriptive of what it does and avoids the vague 'viewport'.
…esolution blocked on closure of the snap-axis question.
…stency; snap positions is defined but snap points is not. Leaving shortname/url/title/issue tracking for now so I don't mess anything up but they should change too.
ChumpChief added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 11, 2016
[css-snappoints] Initial spec merge, starting with the simple stuff :)
@ChumpChief ChumpChief merged commit b92ab14 into w3c:master Jan 11, 2016
birtles added a commit to birtles/csswg-drafts that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant