Skip to content

Conversation

@tabatkins
Copy link
Member

Fixing up a few long-pending Shapes edits for #9053, #8695, #824, and a Guillaume complaint (about the basic shape grammar definitions not being in a prod) that I can't find the issue number for right now.

@cdoublev
Copy link
Collaborator

Will fix #7390, thanks!

ellipse( [ <<shape-radius>>{2} ]? [ at <<position>> ]? )
</dt>
* The <<radial-size>> argument defines
the circle's radius.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Was there a reason for omitting “Negative values are invalid” here and for ellipse()?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Already defined as part of the production, which has bounds on the <length-percentage>. It didn't need to be reproduced.

Copy link
Member

@astearns astearns left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One nit about removing prose for disallowing negative values (only a nit because it’s expressed in the syntax)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants