-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 757
Shapes edits #9723
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Shapes edits #9723
Conversation
…ridden by other specs (like Motion).
…l-size> from Images, per #824
|
Will fix #7390, thanks! |
| ellipse( [ <<shape-radius>>{2} ]? [ at <<position>> ]? ) | ||
| </dt> | ||
| * The <<radial-size>> argument defines | ||
| the circle's radius. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Was there a reason for omitting “Negative values are invalid” here and for ellipse()?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Already defined as part of the production, which has bounds on the <length-percentage>. It didn't need to be reproduced.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One nit about removing prose for disallowing negative values (only a nit because it’s expressed in the syntax)
Fixing up a few long-pending Shapes edits for #9053, #8695, #824, and a Guillaume complaint (about the basic shape grammar definitions not being in a prod) that I can't find the issue number for right now.