Skip to content

refactor: code #8

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2020
Merged

refactor: code #8

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2020

Conversation

cap-Bernardito
Copy link
Member

This PR contains a:

  • bugfix
  • new feature
  • code refactor
  • test update
  • typo fix
  • metadata update

Motivation / Use-Case

refactor code

Breaking Changes

No

Additional Info

No

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 27, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #8 into master will decrease coverage by 16.50%.
The diff coverage is 63.91%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##           master       #8       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   82.85%   66.35%   -16.51%     
===========================================
  Files           2        2               
  Lines          35      107       +72     
  Branches        8       29       +21     
===========================================
+ Hits           29       71       +42     
- Misses          6       30       +24     
- Partials        0        6        +6     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
src/index.js 66.98% <63.91%> (-18.32%) ⬇️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update c2163af...5c5ec0c. Read the comment docs.

@alexander-akait alexander-akait merged commit 6f1e5b2 into master Jul 27, 2020
@alexander-akait alexander-akait deleted the refactor-code branch July 27, 2020 13:05
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants