– is valid again?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Andreas Prilop

    – is valid again?

    I just noticed that documents with – and the like

    are again (!) valid HTML 4.

    Does the W3C validator's behaviour change on a (regular) basis?
  • Eric B. Bednarz

    #2
    Re: – is valid again?

    Andreas Prilop <nhtcapri@rrz n-user.uni-hannover.de> writes:
    [color=blue]
    > I just noticed that documents with – and the like
    > http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...sgml-char.html
    > are again (!) valid HTML 4.[/color]

    Being to young (well, in terms of Internet mangling, which doesn't
    reflect my age compared to acquaintances :) to know otherwise, when and
    how was that different?

    An SGML parser should treat a character reference as data at the point
    of its appearance; the unused codepoint, in return, is the *result* of
    parsing that data (and the problem of the application :).
    'Non-SGML-character' in terms of the SGML declaration is significant to
    *markup* (such as entities, which are commonly confused with character
    references just because /Entity Reference Open/ ['&'] and /Character
    Reference Open/ ['&#'] share a leading character -- an unused codepoint
    which is *subject to parsing*, like referencing an entity declaration
    which contains a numeric reference to such a codepoint (and isn't
    declared to be CDATA), on the other hand, should flag an error).


    --
    "On Usenet, parodies fail, because Usenet itself is a parody."
    --Korpela's 13th Law about Usenet

    Comment

    • Andreas Prilop

      #3
      Re: &amp;#150; is valid again?

      On Thu, 9 Oct 2003, Eric B. Bednarz wrote:
      [color=blue][color=green]
      >> I just noticed that documents with – and the like
      >> http://www.unics.uni-hannover.de/nht...sgml-char.html
      >> are again (!) valid HTML 4.[/color]
      >
      > Being to young (well, in terms of Internet mangling, which doesn't
      > reflect my age compared to acquaintances :) to know otherwise, when and
      > how was that different?[/color]

      Here you go:


      Winston failed to remove all evidence from the archives. ;-)

      --
      Oceania has always been at war with ”.

      Comment

      Working...