"Valid XHTML" Images

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
Collapse
 
  • Page of 1
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
Previous template Next
  • Dante
    #1

    "Valid XHTML" Images

    Just a thought: what if you posted the W3C's "Valid XHTML" images on a
    webpage that doesn't even use XHTML? Or with a Valid CSS thing. What
    could the W3C do to you anyway? Maybe I'll do that just to spite them.
    Tags: None
    • Anne van Kesteren
      #2
      Re: "Valid XHTML" Images

      Dante wrote:
      [color=blue]
      > Just a thought: what if you posted the W3C's "Valid XHTML" images on a
      > webpage that doesn't even use XHTML? Or with a Valid CSS thing. What
      > could the W3C do to you anyway? Maybe I'll do that just to spite them.[/color]

      The W3C does nothing, it will make you look like an idiot. The buttons
      aren't really good anyway, maybe someone here has the link to Jukka
      Korpela's opinion?

      --
      Anne van Kesteren
      <http://www.annevankest eren.nl/>

        Comment

        • brucie
          #3
          Re: &quot;Valid XHTML&quot; Images

          in post <news:bt3bj6$8k t$1@reader10.wx s.nl>
          Anne van Kesteren said:
          [color=blue][color=green]
          >> Just a thought: what if you posted the W3C's "Valid XHTML" images on a
          >> webpage that doesn't even use XHTML? Or with a Valid CSS thing. What
          >> could the W3C do to you anyway? Maybe I'll do that just to spite them.[/color][/color]
          [color=blue]
          > The W3C does nothing, it will make you look like an idiot. The buttons
          > aren't really good anyway, maybe someone here has the link to Jukka
          > Korpela's opinion?[/color]

          http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html



          --
          brucie
          02/January/2004 06:59:02 pm kilo

            Comment

            • David
              #4
              Re: &quot;Valid XHTML&quot; Images

              Anne van Kesteren <mail@annevanke steren.nl> wrote in message news:<bt3bj6$8k t$1@reader10.wx s.nl>...
              [color=blue]
              > The buttons
              > aren't really good anyway, maybe someone here has the link to Jukka
              > Korpela's opinion?[/color]

              http://www.cs.tut.fi/~jkorpela/html/validation.html#icon


              --
              David Håsäther

                Comment

                • Neal
                  #5
                  Re: &quot;Valid XHTML&quot; Images


                  "Dante" <pianoman@reno. com> wrote in message
                  news:f05d63b6.0 401012254.7b939 56e@posting.goo gle.com...[color=blue]
                  > Just a thought: what if you posted the W3C's "Valid XHTML" images on a
                  > webpage that doesn't even use XHTML? Or with a Valid CSS thing. What
                  > could the W3C do to you anyway? Maybe I'll do that just to spite them.[/color]

                  If the result - intended or not - is that a few crappy HTML idiots find out
                  how to code better and their webpages improve, I'm all for it.


                    Comment

                    Previous template Next
                    Working...