35% without JavaScript?

Collapse
This topic is closed.
X
X
 
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts
  • Safalra

    #16
    Re: 35% without JavaScript?

    Andrew Thompson <SeeMySites@www .invalid> wrote in message news:<117wognkv zjiu.1g6wat57gc ah4$.dlg@40tude .net>...[color=blue]
    > On 6 Mar 2004 04:33:28 -0800, Safalra wrote:[color=green]
    > > Stan Brown <the_stan_brown @fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:...[/color]
    > ...[color=green][color=darkred]
    > >> ...Either Morley has a time machine, or someone's computer time
    > >> settings are wrong, or you are mistaken.[/color]
    > >
    > > I have a time machine...[/color]
    >
    > Thanks for clarifying. ;-)
    >
    > Say, ..could I borrow it last weekend?[/color]

    I'm afraid I'm already going to book it out - tomorrow I asked myself
    yesterday whether it would be free last weekend.

    -- Safalra (Stephen Morley) --

    Comment

    • Safalra

      #17
      Re: 35% without JavaScript?

      Stan Brown <the_stan_brown @fastmail.fm> wrote in message news:<MPG.1ab3c 3b9af4fb57b98bf 92@news.odyssey .net>...[color=blue]
      > It seems "Safalra" wrote in comp.infosystem s.www.authoring.html:[color=green]
      > >I have a time machine... Okay, seriously: the last change time on the
      > >page is the time of the last *major* change - it doesn't include
      > >correcting spelling or updating URLs. After I've added a new page, I
      > >read it through again every hour or so, and eventually I find most of
      > >the errors...[/color]
      >
      > Oh sorry -- I thought "last changed" meant "last changed".
      > Seriously, I think you might want to reword that footer if you only
      > record major changes.[/color]

      I'm taking the Platonic view - the document is a flawed image of a
      real document that exists in some other place. Spelling corrections
      are changes to the image; 'major' changes are changes in which object
      the image is a representation of [1]. I'm documenting the later only,
      as it is more useful - the last changed date then tells you whether
      it's worth reading again because of some major conceptual change since
      your last visit.
      [color=blue]
      > Also you might want to fix the arithmetic error (or typo) of 35%
      > where the correct number is 36%.[/color]

      Okay, done.

      [1] Apologies for the appalling grammar there...

      --
      Safalra (Stephen Morley)

      Comment

      Working...