Complete (Ebook PDF) Accounting For Decision Making and Control 9th PDF For All Chapters
Complete (Ebook PDF) Accounting For Decision Making and Control 9th PDF For All Chapters
com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-
accounting-for-decision-making-and-control-9th/
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-accounting-for-decision-
making-and-control-10th-edition/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-cost-accounting-for-
managerial-planning-decision-making-and-control-sixth-edition/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-financial-accounting-tools-
for-business-decision-making-9th-edition/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-aucm-business-law-and-
ethics-2e-custom-for-queensland-universi/
ebooksecure.com
(eBook PDF) Modern Physics for Scientists and Engineers
5th Edition
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-modern-physics-for-
scientists-and-engineers-5th-edition/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-advanced-managerial-
accounting-for-tulane-university-custom/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-processes-systems-and-
information-an-introduction-to-mis-3rd-edition/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/download/java-a-beginners-guide-eighth-
edition-ebook-pdf/
ebooksecure.com
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-skills-for-accounting-
research-3e-by-collins-salzman/
ebooksecure.com
(eBook PDF) Microeconomics 11th Edition by David Colander
https://ebooksecure.com/product/ebook-pdf-microeconomics-11th-edition-
by-david-colander/
ebooksecure.com
Preface vii
Acknowledgments
William Vatter and George Benston motivated my interest in managerial accounting. The
genesis for this book and its approach reflect the oral tradition of my colleagues, past
and present, at the University of Rochester. William Meckling and Michael Jensen stimu-
lated my thinking and provided much of the theoretical structure underlying the book, as
anyone familiar with their work will attest. My long and productive collaboration with
Ross Watts sharpened my analytical skills and further refined the approach. He also fur-
nished most of the intellectual capital for Chapter 3, including the problem material. Ray
Ball has been a constant source of ideas. Clifford Smith and James Brickley continue to
enhance my economic education. Three colleagues, Andrew Christie, Dan Gode, and Scott
Keating, supplied particularly insightful comments that enriched the analysis at critical
junctions. Valuable comments from Anil Arya, Ron Dye, Andy Leone, Dale Morse, Ram
Ramanan, K. Ramesh, Shyam Sunder, and Joseph Weintrop are gratefully acknowledged.
This project benefited greatly from the honest and intelligent feedback of n umerous
instructors. I wish to thank Mahendra Gupta, Susan Hamlen, Badr Ismail, Charles Kile,
Leslie Kren, Don May, William Mister, Mohamed Onsi, Ram Ramanan, Stephen Ryan,
Michael Sandretto, Richard Sansing, Deniz Saral, Gary Schneider, Joe Weber, and
William Yancey. This book also benefited from two other projects with which I have been
involved. Writing Managerial Economics and Organizational Architecture (McGraw Hill
Education, 2016) with James Brickley and Clifford Smith and Management Accounting
in a Dynamic Environment (Routledge, 2016) with Cheryl McWatters helped me to better
understand how to present certain topics.
To the numerous students who endured the development process, I owe an enormous
debt of gratitude. I hope they learned as much from the material as I learned teaching them.
Some were even kind enough to provide critiques and suggestions, in particular Jan Dick
Eijkelboom. Others supplied, either directly or indirectly, the problem material in the text.
The able research assistance of P. K. Madappa, Eamon Molloy, Jodi Parker, Steve Sand-
ers, Richard Sloan, and especially Gary Hurst, contributed amply to the manuscript and
problem material. Janice Willett and Barbara Schnathorst did a superb job of editing the
manuscript and problem material.
The very useful comments and suggestions from the following reviewers are greatly
appreciated:
To my wife Dodie and daughters Daneille and Amy, thank you for setting the right
priorities and for giving me the encouragement and environment to be productive. Finally,
I wish to thank my parents for all their support.
Jerold L. Zimmerman
University of Rochester
Brief Contents
1 Introduction 1
2 The Nature of Costs 22
3 Opportunity Cost of Capital and Capital Budgeting 85
4 Organizational Architecture 127
5 Responsibility Accounting and Transfer Pricing 161
6 Budgeting 216
7 Cost Allocation: Theory 280
8 Cost Allocation: Practices 327
9 Absorption Cost Systems 392
10 Criticisms of Absorption Cost Systems: Incentive to Overproduce 448
11 Criticisms of Absorption Cost Systems: Inaccurate Product Costs 483
12 Standard Costs: Direct Labor and Materials 538
13 Overhead and Marketing Variances 575
14 Management Accounting in a Changing Environment 609
ix
Contents
1 Introduction 1
A. Managerial Accounting: Decision Making and Control 2
B. Design and Use of Cost Systems 4
C. Marmots and Grizzly Bears 8
D. Management Accountant’s Role in the Organization 9
E. Evolution of Management Accounting: A Framework for Change 12
F. Vortec Medical Probe Example 15
G. Outline of the Text 18
H. Summary 18
4 Organizational Architecture 127
A. Basic Building Blocks 128
1. Self-Interested Behavior, Team Production, and Agency Costs 128
2. Decision Rights and Rights Systems 133
3. Role of Knowledge and Decision Making 134
4. Markets versus Firms 135
5. Influence Costs 137
B. Organizational Architecture 139
1. Three-Legged Stool 139
2. Decision Management versus Decision Control 143
C. Accounting’s Role in the Organization’s Architecture 145
D. Example of Accounting’s Role: Executive Compensation Contracts 147
E. Summary 148
6 Budgeting 216
A. Generic Budgeting Systems 219
1. Country Club 219
2. Large Corporation 222
B. Trade-Off between Decision Management and Decision Control 226
1. Communicating Specialized Knowledge versus Performance
Evaluation 226
2. Budget Ratcheting 227
3. Participative Budgeting 229
4. New Approaches to Budgeting 230
5. Managing the Trade-Off 232
C. Resolving Organizational Problems 233
1. Short-Run versus Long-Run Budgets 233
2. Line-Item Budgets 235
3. Budget Lapsing 236
4. Static versus Flexible Budgets 236
5. Incremental versus Zero-Based Budgets 239
D. Summary 241
Appendix: Comprehensive Master Budget Illustration 242
Introduction
Chapter Outline
A. Managerial Accounting: Decision Making
and Control
B. Design and Use of Cost Systems
C. Marmots and Grizzly Bears
D. Management Accountant’s Role in the
Organization
E. Evolution of Management Accounting:
A Framework for Change
F. Vortec Medical Probe Example
G. Outline of the Text
H. Summary
1
Visit https://testbankfan.com
now to explore a rich
collection of testbank or
solution manual and enjoy
exciting offers!
2 Chapter 1
No matter what the firm’s objective, the organization will survive only if its inflow of
resources (such as revenue) is at least as large as the outflow. Accounting information is
useful to help manage the inflow and outflow of resources and to help align the owners’
and employees’ interests, no matter what objectives the owners wish to pursue.
Throughout this book, we assume that individuals maximize their self-interest. The
owners of the firm usually want to maximize profits, but managers and employees will do
so only if it is in their interest. Hence, a conflict of interest exists between owners—who,
in general, want higher profits—and employees—who want easier jobs, higher wages, and
more fringe benefits. To control this conflict, senior managers and owners design systems
to monitor employees’ behavior and incentive schemes that reward employees for generat-
ing more profits. Not-for-profit organizations face similar conflicts. Those people responsi-
ble for the nonprofit organization (boards of trustees and government officials) must design
incentive schemes to motivate their employees to operate the organization efficiently.
All successful firms must devise mechanisms that help align employee interests with
maximizing the organization’s value. All of these mechanisms constitute the firm’s control
system; they include performance measures and incentive compensation systems, promo-
tions, demotions, and terminations, security guards and video surveillance, internal audi-
tors, and the firm’s internal accounting system.1
As part of the firm’s control system, the internal accounting system helps align the
interests of managers and shareholders to cause employees to maximize firm value. It
sounds like a relatively easy task to design systems to ensure that employees maximize
firm value. But a significant portion of this book demonstrates the exceedingly complex
nature of aligning employee interests with those of the owners.
Internal accounting systems serve two purposes: (1) to provide some of the knowledge
necessary for planning and making decisions (decision making) and (2) to help motivate
and monitor people in organizations (control). The most basic control use of accounting is
to prevent fraud and embezzlement. Maintaining inventory records helps reduce employee
theft. Accounting budgets, discussed more fully in Chapter 6, provide an example of both
decision making and control. Asking each salesperson in the firm to forecast his or her sales
for the upcoming year is useful for planning next year’s production (decision making).
However, if the salesperson’s sales forecast is used to benchmark performance for compen-
sation purposes (control), he or she has strong incentives to underestimate those forecasts.
Using internal accounting systems for both decision making and control gives rise to
the fundamental trade-off in these systems: A system cannot be designed to perform two
tasks as well as a system that must perform only one task. Some ability to deliver knowl-
edge for decision making is usually sacrificed to provide better motivation (control). The
trade-off between providing knowledge for decision making and motivation/control arises
continually throughout this text.
This book is applications oriented: It describes how the accounting system assembles
knowledge necessary for implementing decisions using the theories from microeconomics,
finance, operations management, and marketing. It also shows how the accounting system
helps motivate employees to implement these decisions. Moreover, it stresses the continual
trade-offs that must be made between the decision making and control functions of a ccounting.
1
Control refers to the process that helps “ensure the proper behaviors of the people in the organization.
These behaviors should be consistent with the organization’s strategy,” as noted in K. Merchant, Control in
Business Organization (Boston: Pitman Publishing Inc., 1985), p. 4. Merchant provides an extensive
discussion of control systems and a bibliography. In Theory of Accounting and Control (Cincinnati,
OH: South-Western Publishing Company, 1997), S. Sunder describes control as mitigating and resolving
conflicts among employees, owners, suppliers, and customers that threaten to pull organizations apart.
4 Chapter 1
2
Ernst & Young and IMA, “State of Management Accounting,” www.imanet.org/pdf/SurveyofMgtAcctingEY
.pdf, 2003.
Introduction 5
FIGURE 1–1
Taxing Board of
The multiple role of Regulation
Authorities Directors
accounting systems
External Debt
Shareholders SEC/FASB Bondholders
Reports Covenants
Accounting
System
Internal
Reports
Control of
Decision
Organizational
Making
Problems
Figure 1–1 portrays the functions of the accounting system. In it, the accounting
system supports both external and internal reporting systems. Examine the top half of
Figure 1–1. The accounting procedures chosen for external reports to shareholders and
taxing authorities are dictated in part by regulators. In the United States, the Securities
and Exchange Commission (SEC) and the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB)
regulate the financial statements issued to shareholders. The Internal Revenue Service
(IRS) administers the a ccounting procedures used in calculating corporate income taxes. If
the firm is involved in international trade, foreign tax authorities prescribe the accounting
rules applied in c alculating foreign taxes. Regulatory agencies constrain public utilities’
and financial institutions’ accounting procedures.
Management compensation plans and debt contracts often rely on external reports.
Senior managers’ bonuses are often based on accounting net income. Likewise, if the firm
issues long-term bonds, it agrees in the debt covenants not to violate specified accounting-
based constraints. For example, the bond contract might specify that the debt-to-equity
ratio will not exceed some limit. Like taxes and regulation, compensation plans and debt
covenants create incentives for managers to choose particular accounting procedures.3
As firms expand into international markets, external users of the firm’s financial state-
ments become global. No longer are the firm’s shareholders, tax authorities, and regula-
tors domestic. Rather, the firm’s internal and external reports are used internationally in a
variety of ways.
The bottom of Figure 1–1 illustrates that internal reports are used for decision making
as well as control of organizational problems. As discussed earlier, managers use a vari-
ety of sources of data for making decisions. The internal accounting system provides one
3
For further discussion of the incentives of managers to choose accounting methods, see R. Watts and
J. Zimmerman, Positive Accounting Theory (Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1986).
6 Chapter 1
Managerial Multiple accounting systems are confusing and can lead to errors. An extreme example
Application: of this occurred in 1999 when NASA lost its $125 million Mars spacecraft. Engineers
Spaceship at Lockheed Martin built the spacecraft and specified the spacecraft’s thrust in English
Lost Because pounds. But NASA scientists, navigating the craft, assumed the information was in
Two Mea- metric newtons. As a result, the spacecraft was off course by 60 miles as it approached
sures Used Mars and crashed. When two systems are being used to measure the same underlying
event, people can forget which system is being used.
SOURCE: A. Pollack, “Two Teams, Two Measures Equaled One Lost Spacecraft,” The New York Times. October 1, 1999, p. 1.
important source. These internal reports are also used to evaluate and motivate (control)
the behavior of managers in the firm. The internal accounting system reports on manag-
ers’ performance and therefore provides incentives for them. Any changes to the internal
accounting system can affect all the various uses of the resulting accounting numbers.
The internal and external reports are closely linked. The internal accounting system
affords a more disaggregated view of the company. These internal reports are generated
more frequently, usually monthly or even weekly or daily, whereas the external reports
are provided quarterly for publicly traded U.S. companies. The internal reports offer costs
and profits by specific products, customers, lines of business, and divisions of the com-
pany. For example, the internal accounting system computes the unit cost of individual
products as they are produced. These unit costs are then used to value the work-in-process
and finished goods inventory, and to compute cost of goods sold. Chapter 9 describes the
details of product costing.
Because internal accounting systems serve multiple users and have several purposes,
the firm employs either multiple systems (one for each function) or one basic system that
serves all three functions (decision making, performance evaluation, and external report-
ing). Firms can either maintain a single set of books and use the same accounting methods
for both internal and external reports, or they can keep multiple sets of books. The decision
depends on the costs of writing and maintaining contracts based on accounting numbers,
the costs from the dysfunctional internal decisions made using a single system, the addi-
tional bookkeeping costs arising from the extra system, and the confusion of having to
reconcile the different numbers arising from multiple accounting systems.
Inexpensive accounting software packages and falling costs of information technol-
ogy have reduced some of the costs of maintaining multiple accounting systems. However,
confusion arises when the systems report different numbers for the same concept. For
example, when one system reports the manufacturing cost of a product as $12.56 and
another system reports it at $17.19, managers wonder which system is producing the
“right” number. Some managers may be using the $12.56 figure while others are using
$17.19, causing inconsistency and uncertainty. Whenever two numbers for the same con-
cept are produced, the natural tendency is to explain (i.e., reconcile) the differences.
Managers involved in this reconciliation could have used this time in more productive
ways. Also, using the same accounting system for multiple purposes increases the
credibility of the financial reports for each purpose.4 With only one accounting system,
the external auditor monitors the internal reporting system at little or no additional cost.
4
A. Christie, “An Analysis of the Properties of Fair (Market) Value Accounting,” in Modernizing U.S.
S ecurities Regulation: Economic and Legal Perspectives, K. Lehn and R. Kamphuis, eds. (Pittsburgh, PA:
University of Pittsburgh, Joseph M. Katz Graduate School of Business, 1992).
Exploring the Variety of Random
Documents with Different Content
a missionary church. He says, ‘From that time many from the region
of the Scots came daily into Britain, and with great devotion
preached the word of faith to those provinces of the Angles over
which King Osuald reigned; and those among them that had
received priests’ orders administered to the believers the grace of
baptism. Churches were built in several places; the people joyfully
flocked together to hear the Word; possessions and lands were
given of the king’s bounty to build monasteries; the younger Angles
were by their Scottish masters instructed; and greater care and
attention were bestowed upon the rules and observances of regular
discipline.’[312]
A.D.634. The same year which brought to Segine this
Church of the important request from King Osuald of
southern Scots of Northumbria brought him likewise a letter of not
Ireland conforms
to Rome. less importance, but one of a very different tenor,
from the head of one of the dependent
monasteries in Ireland. This letter[313] was written by Cummian, one
of the most learned of the Irish ecclesiastics, and believed to have
been abbot of the monastery of Durrow in King’s County, founded by
Columba shortly before he passed over from Ireland to Iona; and it
is still extant. It is addressed to the abbot ‘Segine, successor of Saint
Columba, and other holy men, and to Beccan the anchorite, his dear
brother according to the flesh and in the spirit, with his wise
companions.’ In this letter he tells him that, when the Roman mode
of computation was first introduced into Ireland, he did not adopt it;
but, retiring in private for a year, he entered into the sanctuary of
God, that is, the holy Scripture, and examined it as well as he was
able; after that, works on history; lastly, whatever cycles he could
meet with. He then gives a very learned summary of the result of his
investigations which led him to adopt the Roman system as correct.
When the year had expired, he says, he applied to the successors of
our ancient fathers, of Bishop Ailbe, of Kieran of Clonmacnois, of
Brendan, of Nessan and of Lugidus, that they might tell him what
they thought of the excommunication directed against them from
the Apostolic See; and they having assembled together, some in
person, others by representatives, at Magh Lene, or the plain of
Lene, in which the monastery of Durrow was situated, came to the
resolution that they ought to adopt without scruple the more worthy
and approved practice recommended to them by the successors of
the apostles of the Lord. They accordingly enjoined him to celebrate
Easter in the following year with the universal church. Not long after,
however, there arose up a certain whited wall, pretending that he
was for upholding the traditions of his elders, which caused disunion
and partly rendered void what had been agreed to. Upon this it was
determined by ‘our seniors’ that if questions of a more weighty
character should arise, they ought to be referred, according to the
decree of the synod, to the head of cities. They therefore sent some
that they knew to be wise and humble, as children to a mother, and
having a prosperous journey by the will of God, and some of them
having come to the city of Rome, they returned in the third year, and
they saw everything accord with what they had heard, or rather they
obtained a much clearer view of the matter, as seeing instead of
hearing; and, being in one lodging with a Greek and a Hebrew, a
Scythian and an Egyptian, they all celebrated their Easter together in
St. Peter’s Church, while they differed from them by a whole month.
And they solemnly assured him of this, saying, This Easter is
celebrated to our knowledge all the world over. ‘These statements,’
adds Cummian, ‘I have made, not with a view to attack you, but to
defend myself.’ Such is the substance of Cummian’s letter;[314] and as
the times for celebrating Easter according to the Roman and to the
Irish computation would be separated by the interval of a month in
the year 631,[315] the synod must have been held about 630, the
return of the deputies taken place in 633, and the letter have been
written in the following year. According to Bede, Pope Honorius in
this year ‘wrote to the nation of the Scots, whom he had found to
err in the observance of Easter, earnestly exhorting them not to
esteem their small number, placed in the utmost borders of the
earth, wiser than all the ancient and modern churches of Christ
throughout the world, and not to celebrate a different Easter,
contrary to the Paschal calculation and the synodical decrees of all
the bishops upon earth;’[316] and the result was that, as Bede tells
us, ‘the Scots which dwelt in the southern districts of Ireland, by the
admonition of the bishop of the Apostolic See, learned to observe
Easter according to the canonical custom;’ while the northern
province of the Scots and the whole nation of the Picts adhered to
the old custom of the country.[317]
The distinction here drawn by Bede between the Scots inhabiting
the southern districts and the northern province of the Scots
obviously refers to the old traditional division of Ireland into two
parts, termed severally Leth Mogha and Leth Cuinn, which were
divided from each other by a ridge extending from the mouth of the
Liffey to Galway, and termed Eisgir Riada.[318] The southern districts
were Munster and Leinster south of the Liffey. The northern division
contained the rest of Leinster, Ulster and Connaught. Durrow,
though a Columban monastery, was situated in the southern
division, and probably now broke off from the jurisdiction of Iona
and, along with the rest of the Irish Church in the southern division
of Ireland, conformed to Rome.
We meet with a passing notice of the monastery of Lismore in the
following year, when Tighernac records the death of its abbot
Eochaidh; and in the same year Abbot Segine appears to have
founded a church in Rechrann, or the island of Rathlin off the north
coast of Ireland.[319]
Some years after a letter appears to have been sent from the Irish
Church to Pope Severinus, who succeeded Honorius in 640, but died
within the year, which called forth a reply from his successor John,
while Pope-elect, by the person who had taken the letter, which
Bede tells us was ‘full of great authority and erudition for correcting
the same error,’ and at the same time admonished them to be
careful to crush the Pelagian heresy, which, he had been informed,
was reviving amongst them. Bede gives us the opening of this
epistle thus:—‘To our most beloved and most holy Tomianus,
Columbanus, Cromanus, Dinanus, and Baithanus, bishops; to
Cromanus, Ernianus, Laistranus, Scellanus, and Segenus, priests; to
Saranus and the rest of the Scottish doctors or abbots, greeting from
Hilarius, the arch-priest and keeper of the place of the holy Apostolic
See; from John, the deacon and elect in the name of God; from John
the chief secretary and keeper of the place of the holy Apostolic See,
and from John the servant of God and councillor of the same
Apostolic See.’[320] These Scottish doctors or abbots, with Tomianus,
who was bishop of Armagh, at their head, all belonged to the
northern province, and this appeal had no effect in altering their
relation towards the Church of Rome. But it is instructive to observe
that Segenus or Segine, abbot of Iona, is placed among the clergy of
the Irish Church, of which his monastery, with its dependent
monasteries in Scotland, was ranked as forming a part. Ten years
afterwards news came of the death of Aidan, after a sixteen years’
episcopate over the church of Northumbria; and Finan, ‘who had,’
says Bede, ‘been sent from Hii, the island and monastery of the
Scots,’ succeeded him.[321]
A.D. 652-657. Segine’s own death followed a year after. His
Suibhne, son of successor was Suibhne, of whom we know
Cuirtri. nothing except that his father’s name was Cuirtri,
but it is unlikely that at this early stage any one who did not belong
to the tribe of the patron saint could be elected an abbot, and the
only notice we have of him is his death after having been five years
in the abbacy.[322]
A.D. 657-669. He was succeeded in the abbacy by Cummene
Cummene Ailbhe, Ailbhe, the nephew of his predecessor Segene,
son of Ernan. whose tenure of office was signalised by equally
important events. His first year is coincident with the extension of
the dominion of Osuiu, the Northumbrian king, over the Britons of
Strathclyde, the southern Picts and the Scots of Dalriada; but,
though the latter ceased for a time to possess an independent king,
the rule of Northumbria could not have affected the church to which
her own church was affiliated. Accordingly, when Finan, the
successor of Aidan, died, we find that Colman was also ‘sent out of
Scotia,’ and succeeded him as bishop.[323] Tighernac records, in the
same year, the death of Bishop Finan and of Daniel, bishop of
Cinngaradh or Kingarth, in Bute; and in the following year, a visit of
Abbot Cummene to Ireland;[324] and, as Bede says of Finan that he
was ordained and sent by the Scots, while, in the case of Colman, he
uses the expression that he was sent out of Scotia, or Ireland, this
rather confirms our suspicion that the bishops called in to consecrate
these Northumbrian missionaries were the bishops of Kingarth, and
that the death of Bishop Daniel in the same year rendered an appeal
to Ireland necessary.
A.D. 664. While, however, Segine’s tenure of the abbacy
Termination of saw the extension of the Columban Church into
Columban Church Northumbria, that of his nephew Cummene was
in Northumbria.
doomed to see its extinction after it had for thirty
years been the church of the country. The cause was the
controversy regarding the proper time for celebrating Easter. It had
been raised, during the episcopate of Finan, by some ecclesiastics
who came from Kent or France; and among them, says Bede, ‘was a
most zealous defender of the true Easter, whose name was Ronan, a
Scot indeed by nation, but instructed in ecclesiastical truth either in
the parts of France or of Italy, who, by disputing with Finan,
corrected many, or at least induced them to make a more strict
inquiry after the truth; yet he could not amend Finan, but on the
contrary made him the more inveterate by reproof, and an open
opposer of the truth, he being of a hot and violent temper.’[325] The
royal family, too, were divided. The queen, Eanfled, being from Kent
and having a Kentish priest, Romanus, with her, followed the
Catholic mode, so that one year the king and queen both celebrated
their Easter at different times. Under Colman the controversy
became more bitter, and the king Osuiu and his son Alchfrid were
now opposed to each other, the latter having been instructed in
Christianity by Wilfrid, a most learned man, who had been originally
trained in the Scottish monastery of Lindisfarne, but had gone from
thence to Rome to learn the ecclesiastical doctrine, and spent much
time at Lyons with Dalfin, archbishop of Gaul, from whom he had
received the coronal tonsure. Agilberct, bishop of the West Saxons, a
friend to Alchfrid and to Abbot Wilfrid, having come to Northumbria,
suggested that a synod should be held to settle the controversy
regarding Easter, the tonsure and other ecclesiastical affairs. This
was agreed to; and it was accordingly held, in the year 664, at the
monastery of Streanashalch, near Whitby, where the abbess Hilda, a
woman devoted to God, then presided. The king Osuiu and his son
Alchfrid were both present. On the Catholic side was Bishop
Agilberct, with the priests Agatho and Wilfrid, James and Romanus.
On the Scottish side was Bishop Colman with his clerics from Scotia,
or Ireland, the abbess Hilda and her followers, and Bishop Cedd of
Essex, who had been ordained by the Scots, and acted as interpreter
for both parties. The king called upon Colman and Wilfrid to conduct
the discussion. It is given at length by Bede, but it is unnecessary to
say more than that the usual arguments were used. Colman pleaded
that the Easter he kept he received from his elders; and all his
forefathers, men beloved of God, are known to have celebrated it
after the same manner. Wilfrid opposed the custom of the universal
church and the authority of Rome. Colman asks, ‘Is it to be believed
that our most reverend father Columba, and his successors, men
beloved by God, who kept Easter after the same manner, thought or
acted contrary to the divine writings? whereas there were many
among them whose sanctity is testified by heavenly signs and the
working of miracles which they performed, whose life, customs and
discipline I never cease to follow, nor question their sanctity.’ Wilfrid
replied, ‘Concerning your father Columba and his followers, whose
sanctity you say you imitate and whose rule and precepts you
observe, which have been confirmed by signs from heaven, I might
answer that when many, on the day of judgment, shall say to our
Lord that in his name they prophesied and cast out devils and
wrought many wonders, our Lord will reply that He never knew
them. But far be it from me that I should say so of your father,
because it is more just to believe what is good than what is evil of
persons whom one does not know. If that Columba of yours—and I
may say ours also, if he were Christ’s—was a holy man and powerful
in miracles, yet should he be preferred before the most blessed
prince of the apostles, to whom our Lord had given the keys of the
kingdom of heaven?’ And as Colman admitted that these words were
spoken to Peter, and could not show that any such power was given
to Columba, the king decided to obey the decrees of Rome, and all
present gave their assent and, renouncing the more imperfect
institution, hastened to conform themselves to that which they found
to be better.[326] Bede then tells us ‘that Colman, perceiving that his
doctrine was rejected and his sect despised, took with him such as
were willing to follow him and would not comply with the Catholic
Easter and the coronal tonsure—for there was much controversy
about that also—and went back into Scotia, or Ireland, to consult
with his people what was to be done in this case.’ And he adds that
Colman carried home with him part of the bones of the most
reverend father Aidan, and left part of them in the church where he
had presided, ordering them to be interred in its sacristy.[327]
The character which this most candid historian gives of the church
of the Scots in Northumbria so much reflects that of the parent
church of Iona, that it may be well to insert it. He says of Bishop
Colman, ‘How great was his parsimony, how great his continence,
the place which they governed shows for himself and his
predecessors, for there were very few houses besides the church
found at their departure, indeed no more than were barely sufficient
for their daily residence. They had also no money but cattle; for, if
they received any money from rich persons, they immediately gave
it to the poor, there being no need to gather money or provide
houses for the entertainment of the great men of the world? for
such never resorted to the church except to pray and hear the Word
of God. For this reason the religious habit was at that time in great
veneration, so that, wheresoever any cleric or monk happened to
come, he was joyfully received by all persons, as God’s servant; and,
if they chanced to meet him as he was upon the way they ran to him
and, bowing, were glad to be signed with his hand or blessed with
his mouth. Great attention was also paid to their exhortations; and
on Sundays the people flocked eagerly to the church or the
monasteries, not to feed their bodies, but to hear the Word of God;
and, if any priest happened to come into a village the inhabitants
flocked together forthwith to hear from him the Word of Life. For the
priests and clerics went into the villages on no other account than to
preach, baptize, visit the sick and, in few words, to take care of
souls; and they were so free from the curse of worldly avarice, that
none of them received lands and possessions for building
monasteries, unless they were compelled to do so by the temporal
authorities.’[328]
Though Bede tells us in general terms that Colman returned to
Ireland, he did not actually do so till after four years; for he
mentions afterwards that Colman ‘repaired first to the isle of Hii, or
Iona, whence he had been sent to preach the word of God to the
Anglic nation. Afterwards he retired to a certain small island which is
to the west of Ireland, and at some distance from its coast, called, in
the language of the Scots, Inisboufinde,’ and Tighernac places this
event in the year 668.[329] As he had taken the relics of Aidan with
him, it was probably during this interval that he founded the church
of Fearn in Angus, dedicated to Aidan, and the church of Tarbet, in
Easter Ross, with which his own name is connected; and if he
reported to Abbot Cummene, as no doubt he would, the discussion
he had held with Wilfrid, and the appeal which he had made in vain
to the authority of Columba as a man whose sanctity was testified
by heavenly signs and the working of miracles, it probably led to
Cummene’s writing the Life of their great saint, which Adamnan calls
‘the book which he wrote on the virtues of St. Columba,’[330] in
vindication of the assertion. This Life is still extant, and the whole of
it has been embodied in Adamnan’s more elaborate production.
Tighernac records the death of Cummene in the year 669, and along
with it those of two saints who belonged to the church among the
southern Picts—Itharnan or Ethernanus, of Madderdyn, now
Madderty in Strathearn, and Corindu, or Caran, of Fetteresso in the
Mearns.[331]
A.D. 669-679. His successor was Failbhe, son of Pipan, also a
Failbhe, son of descendant of Conall Gulban, and the first year of
Pipan. his tenure of the abbacy also saw Wilfrid in
possession of the diocese of York. According to Bede, he at this time
administered the bishopric of York and of all the Northumbrians, and
likewise of the Picts as far as the dominions of king Osuiu extended.
[332]
His diocese therefore comprehended the territories of the
southern Picts, the Britons of Strathclyde and the Scots of Dalriada,
over all of which King Osuiu had extended his rule. Wilfrid retained
this extensive diocese during the entire period of Failbhe’s abbacy;
and, so far as he could make his power felt, his influence would no
doubt be exercised against the Columban Church; for, as Eddi tells
us, ‘under Bishop Wilfrid the churches were multiplied both in the
south among the Saxons and in the north among the Britons, Scots
and Picts, Wilfrid having ordained everywhere presbyters and
deacons, and governed new churches.’[333] But the territories of the
northern Picts were beyond his reach; and Failbhe’s tenure of the
abbacy is chiefly remarkable for the extension of the Columban
Church to those rugged and almost inaccessible districts which lay
on the western seaboard between Ardnamurchan on the south and
Loch Broom on the north.
A.D. 673. The principal agent in effecting this was
Foundation of Maelrubha, who was of the race of the northern
church of Hy Neill, but belonged to a different sept from
Applecross by that which had the right of furnishing abbots to
Maelrubha.
the monastery of Iona. He was connected
through his mother with Comgall of Bangor, and became a member
of that monastery which, as situated among the Picts of Ireland, well
fitted him to be a missionary to those of the same race in Scotland.
He came over to Britain in the year 671, and two years afterwards
he founded the church of Aporcrosan, now Applecross,[334] from
which as a centre he evangelised the whole of the western districts
lying between Loch Carron and Loch Broom, as well as the south
and west parts of the island of Skye, and planted churches in Easter
Ross and elsewhere. The dedications to him show that his
missionary work was very extensive. In the same year Failbhe went
to Ireland, where he appears to have remained three years,[335] and
was probably engaged in arrangements for extending the missionary
work; for it is probably at this period that we must place the arrival
of Comgan with his sister Kentigerna and her son Fillan in the district
of Lochalsh, where they planted churches, as well as in the districts
south of it as far as Loch Sunart.[336] At this time too the church in
Egg appears to have been restored.[337] In the year 678 Wilfrid was
ejected from his extensive bishopric, but Failbhe only survived this
event one year, when his death is recorded; and at the same time
we have a trace of the church in the eastern territories of the
northern Picts, in the death of Neachtan Neir, who can be identified
with the great saint of Deeside in Aberdeenshire, called by the
people there, Nathalan, or Nachlan.[338]
A.D. 679-704. We are now brought in our narrative to the
Adamnan, son of very important period when Adamnan, the
Ronan. biographer of Columba, ruled over his monastery
as ninth abbot. He was also a descendant of Conall Gulban, and
belonged to the tribe of the patron saint. He was born in 624, just
twenty-seven years after the death of Saint Columba. During the
first six years of his abbacy, the rule of the Angles, under King
Ecgfrid, still extended as far as it did during the reign of his father
Osuiu. After the ejection of Wilfrid from the diocese in this its fullest
extent, it was divided between Bosa and Eata, the latter being
appointed bishop of the northern part; and three years afterwards it
was still further divided, Trumuin being appointed bishop over the
province of the Picts which was subject to the Angles. The defeat
and death of King Ecgfrid, however, at the battle of Dunnichen in the
year 685 terminated this rule of the Angles, and with it the
interference of the Anglic bishops with the Columban Church. The
Scots of Dalriada recovered their independence. The southern Picts
were relieved from the more direct yoke of the Angles, and Trumuin
fled from his diocese.
A.D. 686. The new king Aldfrid had been long in exile in
His first mission Ireland, where he was known by the name of
to Northumbria. Flann Finn, and Adamnan was on terms of
friendly acquaintance with him. His first proceeding was to go on a
mission to him to ask the release of the Irish captives whom Berct,
King Ecgfrid’s general, had carried away from the plain of Breg; and
the Irish Life of Adamnan gives us the route he took. It says ‘The
North Saxons went to him and plundered Magh Bregh as far as
Bealach-duin; they carried off with them a great prey of men and
women. The men of Erin besought of Adamnan to go in quest of the
captives to Saxonland. Adamnan went to demand the prisoners, and
put in at Tracht-Romra. The strand is long, and the flood rapid; so
rapid that if the best steed in Saxonland ridden by the best
horseman were to start from the edge of the tide when the tide
begins to flow, he could only bring his rider ashore by swimming, so
extensive is the strand, and so impetuous is the tide.’ Adamnan
appears therefore to have gone in his curach and entered the
Solway Firth, which is evidently the place meant, and landed on the
southern shore. He succeeded in his undertaking, and brought sixty
of the captives back to their homes.[339]
Adamnan repairs His next step was to repair the monastery,
the monastery of which had probably fallen into disrepair during
Iona. Failbhe’s time; and for this purpose he sent
twelve vessels to Lorn for oak trees to furnish the necessary timber.
[340]
In this monastery he received Arculfus, a bishop of Gaul, who
had gone to Jerusalem to visit the holy places, and returning home
was driven by a violent storm on the west coast of Britain and made
his way to Iona and passed the winter there. During the dreary
winter months, Adamnan committed to writing all the information he
could obtain from him as to the holy places; and this work is still
extant.[341]
A.D. 688. In 688 Adamnan proceeded on a second
His second mission to King Aldfrid, with what object is not
mission to known; but it appears to have been connected
Northumbria.
with the affairs of Dalriada. This second visit to
Northumbria had very important consequences both for himself and
for his church; for Bede tells us that ‘Adamnan, priest and abbot of
the monks that were in the isle of Hii, was sent ambassador by his
nation to Aldfrid, king of the Angles, where, having made some stay,
he observed the canonical rites of the church, and was earnestly
admonished by many who were more learned than himself not to
presume to live contrary to the universal custom of the church in
relation to either the observance of Easter or any other decrees
whatsoever, considering the small number of his followers, seated at
so distant a corner of the world. In consequence of this he changed
his mind, and readily preferred those things which he had seen and
heard in the churches of the Angles to the customs which he and his
people had hitherto followed. For he was a good and a wise man,
and remarkably learned in the knowledge of the Scriptures;’[342] and
Abbot Ceolfrid of Jarrow, in his letter to King Naiton of the Picts, who
calls him ‘Adamnan, the abbot and renowned priest of the
Columbans,’ says that he visited his monastery, and narrates at
length the conversation he had with him, to which he attributes
Adamnan’s conversion.[343] ‘Returning home,’ continues Bede, ‘he
endeavoured to bring his own people that were in Hii, or that were
subject to that monastery, into the way of truth, which he himself
had learned and embraced with all his heart; but in this he could not
prevail.’ We have thus the anomalous state of matters that the abbot
of the monastery had conformed to Rome, but that his monks and
those of the dependent monasteries refused to go along with him. In
the year after his return to Iona, the death of Iolan, bishop of
Cinngaradh, or Kingarth in Bute, is recorded; and in 692, which the
annalist marks as the fourteenth after the decease of his
predecessor Failbhe, he went to Ireland, but for what especial
purpose which might render the reference to Failbhe appropriate, we
do not learn; and the following year we find him again in Iona, when
the body of Brude mac Bile, king of the Picts, who died in 693, is
brought for interment.[344]
A.D. 692. Four years after, in the year 697, he goes again
Synod of Tara. to Ireland, and on this occasion he was
The northern accompanied by Brude, son of Derile, king of the
Scots, with the
exception of the Picts. His object was to obtain the sanction of the
Columban Irish people to a law exempting women from the
monasteries, burden laid upon all, of what was called Fecht
conform to Rome. and Sluagad, or the duty attending hostings and
expeditions. For this purpose a synod was held at Tara, which was
attended by thirty-nine ecclesiastics presided over by the abbot of
Armagh, and by forty-seven chiefs of tribes, at the head of whom
was the monarch of Ireland. The law exempting women from this
burdensome duty was termed ‘Lex innocentium;’ and the
enactments of the synod were called Cain Adhamhnain or ‘Lex
Adamnani,’ because among its results was the privilege of levying
contributions under certain conditions.[345] In the list of those present
occurs the name of Brude mac Derili ri Cruithentuaithe, or King of
Pictland. It is to the occasion of this visit to Ireland that must be
referred the statement of Bede that ‘he then sailed over into Ireland
to preach to those people, and, by modest exhortation declaring the
true time of Easter, he reduced many of them, and almost all that
were not under the dominion of those of Hii, from their ancient error
to the Catholic unity, and taught them to keep the proper time of
Easter. Returning to his island after having celebrated Easter in
Ireland canonically, he most earnestly inculcated the observance of
Easter in his monastery, yet without being able to prevail; and it so
happened that he departed this life before the next year came
round. For the divine goodness so ordained it that, as he was a
great lover of peace and unity, he should be taken away to
everlasting life before he would be obliged, on the return of the time
of Easter, to have still more serious discord with those that would
not follow him in the truth.’[346] It would therefore appear that
Adamnan did not return to Iona till the year of his death, which took
place on the 23d of September in the year 704, and in the seventy-
seventh year of his age.[347]
At what period of Adamnan’s abbacy he wrote his life of the
patron saint and founder of the monastery cannot be fixed with any
accuracy, but it was after his visit to Aldfrid in 688; and, as he states
that he did so at the urgent request of his brethren, and alludes
incidentally to the discord which arose among the churches of
Ireland on account of the difference with regard to the Easter feast,
it was probably compiled before the same discord had arisen
between the brethren of Iona and himself as their abbot.[348] Neither
can the precise period be fixed when he founded those churches in
the eastern districts which are dedicated to him; but no doubt, after
the termination of the Anglic rule over the southern Picts and Scots
of Dalriada, he would be desirous to strengthen the Columban
Church; and his relations with the kings of the Picts who reigned
after the overthrow of the Angles were, as we have seen, cordial
and friendly. In this work he appears to have been assisted by the
family who had already evangelised the rugged district termed the
‘Rough Bounds,’ as the churches dedicated to them and him are
found adjacent to each other. Among the northern Picts, Adamnan’s
principal church was that of Forglen on the east bank of the river
Doveran, in which the Brecbannoch, or banner of Columba, was
preserved; and separated from it by the same river is Turriff,
dedicated to Comgan. South of the range of the Mounth Adamnan’s
most important foundation was the monastery of Dull in the district
of Atholl, which was dedicated to him, and to which a very extensive
territory was annexed; and closely contiguous to it was the district of
Glendochart, with its monastery dedicated to Fillan, whose name is
preserved in Strathfillan. Fillan again appears in Pittenweem on the
south coast of the peninsula of Fife; and in the Firth of Forth which it
bounds is Inchkeith, ‘on which Saint Adamnan the abbot
presided.’[349]
A.D. 704-717. Adamnan, though, as Bede says, a man of
Schism at Iona peace and providentially removed before the
coming Easter, when matters would have been
after death of brought to a crisis between him and his
Adamnan. recalcitrant monks, seems notwithstanding to
have left a legacy of discord behind him. For the first time since the
foundation of the monastery of Iona, we find in the successor of
Adamnan an abbot who was not a descendant of Conall Gulban.
Conmael, son of Failbhe, was of the tribe of Airgialla in Ireland, who
were descended from Colla Uais; but three years after Adamnan’s
death we find Duncadh, who belonged to the tribe of the patron
saint, obtaining the abbacy. Then three years after we have the
death of Conmael as abbot of Iona. After his death appears Ceode,
bishop of Iona, who dies in 712, and in 713 Dorbeni obtains the
chair of Iona, but after five months’ possession of the primacy dies
on Saturday the 28th of October in the same year. During the whole
of this time, however, Duncadh is likewise abbot.[350] The explanation
seems to be that the community of Iona had become divided on the
subject of the Easter question, and that a party had become
favourable to Adamnan’s views. As he had not succeeded in bringing
over any of the Columban monasteries, they were driven to obtain
an abbot elsewhere, and procured the nomination of Conmael; while
the opposing party having got the upper hand three years after,
Duncadh, the legitimate successor of the line of Conall Gulban,
obtained the abbacy, and there was thus a schism in the community
—one section of them celebrating their Easter after the Roman
system, who had at their head Conmael, Ceode the bishop, and
Dorbeni; and the other and more powerful section maintaining,
under the presidency of Duncadh, the old custom of their church.
After narrating how ‘at that time,’ that is, in 710, ‘Naiton, king of the
Picts who inhabit the northern parts of Britain, taught by frequent
study of the ecclesiastical writings, renounced the error by which he
and his nation had till then been held in relation to the observance
of Easter, and submitted, together with his people, to celebrate the
Catholic time of our Lord’s resurrection,’ Bede closes his notices of
the monastery of Iona by telling us that ‘not long after, those monks
also of the Scottish nation who lived in the isle of Hii, with the other
monasteries that were subject to them, were, by the procurement of
our Lord, brought to the canonical observance of Easter and the
right mode of tonsure. For in the year after the incarnation of our
Lord 716, the father and priest Ecgberct, beloved of God and worthy
to be named with all honour, coming to them from Ireland, was very
honourably and joyfully received by them. Being a most agreeable
teacher and most devout in practising those things which he taught,
he was willingly heard by all; and, by his pious and frequent
exhortations he converted them from the inveterate tradition of their
ancestors. He taught them to perform the principal solemnity after
the Catholic and apostolic manner;’ and Bede adds, ‘The monks of
Hii, by the instruction of Ecgberct, adopted the Catholic rites, under
Abbot Dunchad, about eighty years after they had sent Bishop Aidan
to preach to the nation of the Angles.’[351] It is rarely, however, that,
when a change is proposed in matters of faith or practice, a
Christian community is unanimous, and there is always an opposing
minority who refuse their assent to it. So it must have been here, for
in the same passage in which Tighernac notices the adoption of the
Catholic Easter in 716 he adds that Faelchu mac Dorbeni takes the
chair of Columba in the eighty-seventh year of his age, and on
Saturday the 29th of August; while he records the death of Abbot
Duncadh in the following year.[352] We have here again a schism in
the community; and no sooner does Abbot Duncadh with his
adherents go over to the Roman party, than the opposing section
adopt a new abbot.
A.D. 717 The greater part, if not the whole, of the
Expulsion of the dependent monasteries among the Picts seem to
Columban monks have resisted the change, and to have refused
from the kingdom
of the Picts. obedience to the decree which Bede tells us King
Naiton had issued, when ‘the cycles of nineteen
years were forthwith by public command sent throughout all the
provinces of the Picts to be transcribed, learned and observed;’ for
we are told by Tighernac that in 717, when Abbot Duncadh had died
and Faelchu remained alone in possession of the abbacy, the family
of Iona were driven across Drumalban by King Naiton. In other
words, the whole of the Columban monks were expelled from his
kingdom;[353] and there is reason to think that Faelchu had been at
the head of one of these dependent monasteries in the territories of
the northern Picts.[354] It is possible that the monks of the
monasteries recently established among the southern Picts by
Adamnan may have conformed; but those of the older foundations,
such as Abernethy and Cillrigmonadh, or St. Andrews, were probably
driven out; and thus with the expulsion of the family of Iona
terminated the primacy of its monastery over the monasteries and
churches in the extensive districts of the east and north of Scotland
which formed at that time the kingdom of the Picts.
256. Ib., B. i. cc. 24, 41; B. ii. c. 15; B. iii. c. 8. See ed. 1874,
Appendix I., for an account of the monasteries in Tiree.
261. See Reeves’s Adamnan, ed. 1874, App. No. I., for an account
of the remains on this island.
266. Colgan, Tr. Th., p. 481. Obits of Christ Church, Dublin, p. 65.
273. Chron. Picts and Scots, p. 201. Constantin reigned from 790
to 820 and Gartnaidh from 584 to 599, which places the foundation
of Abernethy during the ten years from 584 to 596.
283. This frequently happens when the wind blows strongly from
the south-west.
284. St. Columba’s day was the 9th of June, and the year on
which he died is determined by the consideration of whether he
must be held to have died on Saturday evening or on Sunday
morning. If on Sunday, then the 9th of June fell on a Sunday in the
year 597. If on Saturday, then the 9th of June fell on a Saturday in
596. The former is most consistent with Adamnan’s narrative, who
places his death after midnight, and states the duration of his life in
Iona at 34 years, which, added to 563, gives us the year 597. Bede’s
statement, though made on different data, brings us to the same
year. He brings him over in 565, but gives 32 years as the duration
of his life after, which also brings us to 597. Tighernac seems to have
adopted the other view, for he says that he died on the eve of
Whitsunday, ‘in nocte Dominica Pentecosten,’ and Whitsunday fell on
the 10th of June 596; but this is inconsistent with his other
statement, that he came over to Britain in 563, and died in the
thirty-fifth year of his pilgrimage, which brings us to 597.
287. Amra Choluimchille, by O’Beirne Crowe, pp. 27, 39, 49, 51,
53, 65.
313. The title of the letter is—‘In nomine Divino Dei summi
confido. Dominis sanctis et in Christo venerandis Segieno abbati,
Columbæ Sancti et cæterorum sanctorum successori, Beccanoque
solitario, charo carne et spiritu fratri, cum suis sapientibus,
Cummianus supplex peccator, magnis minimus, apologeticam in
Christo salutem.’
315. According to the Irish method Easter in 631 fell on 21st April,
according to the Roman on the 24th of March.
321. Bede, Hist. Ec., B. iii. c. 17. 651 Quies Aidain episcopi Saxan.
—Tigh.
335. A.D. 673 Navigatio Failbe abbatis Iea in Hiberniam. A.D. 676
Failbe de Hibernia revertitur.—Tigh.
340. Adamnan, B. ii. c. 46. Boece states that the monastery was
rebuilt by Maelduin, king of Dalriada, whose death is recorded by
Tighernac in 690. He therefore reigned at the very time when
Adamnan was abbot, and this fixes the date of these repairs as
between 687 and 690.
345. Dr. Reeves’s Adamnan, ed. 1874, p. clvi. A.D. 697 Adamnan
tuc recht lecsa in Erind an bliadhna seo (brought a law with him this
year to Ireland).—Tigh.
347. A.D. 704 Adamnanus lxxvii anno ætatis suæ, in nonas kalendis
Octobris, abbas Ie, pausat.—Tigh.
J. Bartholomew, Edin.
CHAPTER V.