Engineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving 8th Edition Arvid R. Eidepdf download
Engineering Fundamentals and Problem Solving 8th Edition Arvid R. Eidepdf download
or textbooks at https://ebookmass.com
_____ Follow the link below to get your download now _____
https://ebookmass.com/product/engineering-fundamentals-and-
problem-solving-8th-edition-arvid-r-eide/
https://ebookmass.com/product/community-policing-partnerships-for-
problem-solving-8th-edition-ebook-pdf/
https://ebookmass.com/product/community-policing-partnerships-for-
problem-solving-8th-edition-ebook-pdf-version/
https://ebookmass.com/product/problem-solving-in-chest-
imaging-2019-1st-edition-subba-r-digumarthy-md/
https://ebookmass.com/product/problem-solving-and-python-programming-
e-balagurusamy/
Programming for Problem Solving E Balagurusamy
https://ebookmass.com/product/programming-for-problem-solving-e-
balagurusamy/
https://ebookmass.com/product/programming-and-problem-solving-with-
python-ashok-namdev-kamthane/
https://ebookmass.com/product/pericyclic-reactions-a-mechanistic-and-
problem-solving-approach-1st-edition-kumar/
https://ebookmass.com/product/introduction-to-computing-and-problem-
solving-using-python-1st-edition-e-balaguruswamy/
https://ebookmass.com/product/business-problem-solving-and-strategy-
manga-for-success-1st-edition-takayuki-kito/
Page i
Arvid R. Eide
Iowa State University
Steven K. Mickelson
Iowa State University
Cheryl L. Eide
Iowa State University
Roland D. Jenison
Iowa State University
Larry L. Northup
Iowa State University
Eighth Edition
Page ii
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 LKV 27 26 25 24 23 22
ISBN 978-1-265-14055-7
MHID 1-265-14055-3
The Internet addresses listed in the text were accurate at the time of
publication. The inclusion of a website does not indicate an
endorsement by the authors or McGraw Hill LLC, and McGraw Hill
LLC does not guarantee the accuracy of the information presented at
these sites.
mheducation.com/highered
Page iii
Contents
4 Engineering Solutions
4.1 Introduction
4.2 Problem Analysis
4.3 The Engineering Method
4.4 Problem Presentation
4.5 Standards of Problem Presentation
5.1 Introduction
5.2 Collecting and Recording Data
5.3 General Graphing Procedures
5.4 Empirical Functions
5.5 Curve Fitting
5.6 Method of Selected Points and Least Squares
5.7 Empirical Equations: Linear
5.8 Empirical Equations: Power Curves
5.9 Empirical Equations: Exponential Curves
Page iv
6 Engineering Measurements and Estimations
6.1 Introduction
6.2 Measurements: Accuracy and Precision
6.3 Measurements: Significant Digits
6.4 Errors
6.5 Estimations
7.1 Introduction
7.2 Progress in the United States toward Metrification
7.3 Physical Quantities
7.4 Dimensions
7.5 Units
7.6 SI Units and Symbols
7.7 Rules for Using SI Units
7.8 U.S. Customary and Engineering Systems
7.9 Conversion of Units
7.10 Celsius, Fahrenheit, and Absolute Scales
8.1 Introduction
8.2 Simple and Compound Interest
8.3 Cash-Flow Diagram
8.4 Present Worth and Future Worth
8.5 Annual Worth and Gradients
8.6 Summary Table
10 Statistics
10.1 Introduction
10.2 Frequency Distribution
10.3 Measures of Central Tendency
10.4 Measures of Variation
10.5 Linear Regression
10.6 Coefficient of Correlation
Page v
12 Mechanics: Statics
12.1 Introduction
12.2 Scalars and Vectors
12.3 Forces
12.4 Types of Force Systems
12.5 Transmissibility
12.6 Resolution of Forces
12.7 Moments
12.8 Free-Body Diagrams
12.9 Equilibrium
13.1 Introduction
13.2 Stress
13.3 Strain
13.4 Modulus of Elasticity
13.5 Design Stress
13.6 Stress Concentration
14 Material Balance
14.1 Introduction
14.2 Conservation of Mass
14.3 Processes
14.4 A Systematic Approach
Page vi
17 Electrical Theory
17.1 Introduction
17.2 Structure of Electricity
17.3 Static Electricity
17.4 Electric Current
17.5 Electric Potential
17.6 Simple Electric Circuits
17.7 Resistance
17.8 DC Circuit Concepts
17.9 DC Electric Power
17.10 Terminal Voltage
17.11 Kirchhoff’s Laws
17.12 Mesh Currents
18 Flowcharts
18.1 Introduction
18.2 Flowcharting
Appendices
Preface
To the Student
As you begin the study of engineering no doubt you are filled with
enthusiasm, curiosity, and a desire to succeed. Your first year will be
spent primarily in establishing a solid foundation in mathematics,
basic sciences, and communications. Also, you will be introduced to
selected engineering topics that will demonstrate how engineers
approach problem solving, arrive at correct solutions, and interface
with other engineering professionals and the general public to
implement the solutions. You will see how mathematics, science, and
communications provide the means to solve problems and convey
the solutions in a manner that can be clearly understood and quickly
verified by the appropriate persons. Next, you will discover the need
for more in-depth study in many engineering subjects in order to
solve increasingly complex problems. We believe the material
presented in this book will provide you with a fundamental
understanding of how engineers function in today’s technological
world. After your study of topics in this text, we believe you will be
eager to enter the advanced engineering subjects in your chosen
discipline, confident that you will successfully achieve your
educational goals. You will also find profiles of practicing engineers
who were in your shoes a few years ago. They will show the result of
your hard work will result in amazing careers.
To the Instructor
Engineering courses for first-year students cover a wide range of
topics from an overview of the engineering profession to discipline-
specific subjects. A broad set of course goals, including coverage of
prerequisite material, motivation, and retention, have spawned a
variety of first-year activity. Courses in introductory engineering and
problem solving routinely utilize spreadsheets and mathematical
solvers in addition to teaching the rudiments of a computer
language. The Internet has become a major instructional tool,
providing a wealth of data to supplement your class notes and
textbooks. This eighth edition continues the authors’ intent to
introduce the profession of engineering and to provide students with
many of the tools and techniques needed to succeed.
The eighth edition of this text draws on the experiences the
authors have encountered with the first seven editions and
incorporates many excellent suggestions from faculty and students
using the text. Over the past 40+ years the fundamentals of problem
solving have remained nearly the same, but the numerical tools and
presentation techniques have improved tremendously. Therefore our
general objectives remain the same for this eighth edition, and we
have concentrated on new and emerging problems like microplastics
pollution and desalination of water for drinking and community use
and improvements in the textual material.
The objectives are (1) to motivate engineering students during
their first year when exposure to the subject matter of engineering is
limited, (2) to provide students with experience in solving problems
in both SI and customary units while presenting solutions in a logical
manner, (3) to introduce students to subject areas common to most
engineering disciplines that require the application of fundamental
engineering concepts, and (4) to develop students’ skills in solving
open-ended problems.
Page viii
Page ix
Acknowledgments
The authors are indebted to many who assisted in the development
of this edition of the textbook. First, we would like to thank the
faculty of the former Division of Engineering Fundamentals and
Multidisciplinary Design at Iowa State University, who have taught
the engineering computations courses over the past 40+ years. They,
with the support of engineering faculty from other departments,
have made the courses a success by their efforts. Several thousands
of students have taken the courses, and we want to thank them for
their comments and ideas, which have influenced this edition. The
many suggestions of faculty and students alike have provided us with
much information that was necessary to improve the previous
editions. Special thanks go to the reviewers for this edition whose
suggestions were extremely valuable. These suggestions greatly
shaped the manuscript in preparation of the eighth edition.
Finally, we thank our families for their continuing support of our
efforts.
Arvid R. Eide
Steven K. Mickelson
Cheryl L. Eide
Roland D. Jenison
Larry L. Northup
Page x
Page xi
Page xiv
CHAPTER 1
Chapter Objectives
When you complete your study of this chapter, you will be able to:
Since you are reading this book, we assume that you are interested in
studying engineering or at least are trying to decide whether to do so. Up to
this point in your academic life you probably have had little experience
with engineering as a career and have gathered your impressions from
advertising materials, counselors, educators, and perhaps a practicing
engineer or two. Now you must investigate as many careers as you can as
soon as possible to be sure of making the right choice.
The study of engineering requires a strong background in mathematics
and the physical sciences. Section 1.5 discusses typical areas of study
within an engineering program that lead to the bachelor’s degree. You also
should consult with your academic counselor about specific course
requirements. If you are enrolled in an engineering program but have not
chosen a specific discipline, consult with an adviser or someone on the
engineering faculty about particular course requirements in your areas of
interest.
Page 2
What is engineering?
What are the career opportunities for engineers?
What are the engineering disciplines?
Where does the engineer fit into the technical spectrum?
How are engineers educated?
What is meant by professionalism and engineering ethics?
What have engineers done in the past?
What are engineers doing now? What will engineers do in the future?
What are the workplace competencies needed to be a successful
engineer?
Page 3
In 1876, 15 men led by Thomas Alva Edison gathered in Menlo Park, New
Jersey, to work on “inventions.” By 1887, the group had secured over 400
patents, including ones for the electric lightbulb and the phonograph.
Edison’s approach typified that used for early engineering developments.
Usually one person possessed nearly all the knowledge in one field and
directed the research, development, design, and manufacture of new
products in this field.
Today, however, technology has become so advanced and sophisticated
that one person cannot possibly be aware of all the intricacies of a single
device or process. The concept of systems engineering thus has evolved;
that is, technological problems are studied and solved by a technology
team.
Scientists, engineers, technologists, technicians, and craftspersons form
the technology team. The functions of the team range across what often is
called the technical spectrum. At one end of the spectrum are functions
that involve work with scientific and engineering principles. At the other
end of this technical spectrum are functions that bring designs into reality.
Successful technology teams use the unique abilities of all team members
to bring about a successful solution to a human need.
Each of the technology team members has a specific function in the
technical spectrum, and it is of utmost importance that each specialist
understands the role of all team members. It is not difficult to find
instances where the education and tasks of team members overlap. For any
engineering accomplishment, successful team performance requires
cooperation that can be realized only through an understanding of the
functions of the technology team. The technology team is one part of a
larger team that has the overall responsibility for bringing a device,
process, or system into reality. This team, frequently called a project or
design team, may include managers, sales representatives, field service
persons, financial representatives, and purchasing personnel in addition to
the technology team members. These project teams meet frequently from
the beginning of the project to ensure that schedules and design
specifications are met, and that potential problems are diagnosed early. We
will now investigate each of the team specialists in more detail.
1.2.1 Scientist
Scientists have as their prime objective increased knowledge of nature (see
Figure 1.2). In the quest for new knowledge, the scientist conducts research
in a systematic manner. The research steps, referred to as the scientific
method, are often summarized as follows:
Page 4
1.2.2 Engineer
The profession of engineering takes the knowledge of mathematics and
natural sciences gained through study, experience, and practice and
applies this knowledge with judgment to develop ways to utilize the
materials and forces of nature for the benefit of all humans.
An engineer is a person who possesses this knowledge of mathematics
and natural sciences, and through the principles of analysis and design
applies this knowledge to the solution of problems and the development of
devices, processes, structures, and systems. Both the engineer and scientist
are thoroughly educated in the mathematical and physical sciences, but the
scientist primarily uses this knowledge to acquire new knowledge, whereas
the engineer applies the knowledge to design and develops usable devices,
structures, and processes. In other words, the scientist seeks to know, the
engineer aims to do.
You might conclude that the engineer is totally dependent on the
scientist for the knowledge to develop ideas for human benefit. Such is not
always the case. Scientists learn a great deal from the work of engineers.
For example, the science of thermodynamics was developed by a physicist
from studies of practical steam engines built by engineers who had no
science to guide them. On the other hand, engineers have applied the
principles of nuclear fission discovered by scientists to develop nuclear
power plants and numerous other devices and systems requiring nuclear
reactions for their operation. The scientist’s and engineer’s functions
frequently overlap, leading at times to a somewhat blurred image of the
engineer. What distinguishes the engineer from the scientist in broad
terms, however, is that the engineer often conducts research but does so
for the purpose of solving a problem.
Page 5
Page 6
Page 7
Page 8
Page 9
1.4.1 Research
Successful research is one catalyst for starting the activities of a technology
team or, in many cases, the activities of an entire industry. The research
engineer seeks new findings, as does the scientist; but keep in mind that
the research engineer also seeks a way to use the discovery.
Key qualities of a successful research engineer are perceptiveness,
patience, and self-confidence. Most students interested in research will
pursue the master’s and doctor’s degrees in order to develop their
intellectual abilities and the necessary research skills. An alert and
perceptive mind is needed to recognize nature’s truths when they are
encountered. When attempting to reproduce natural phenomena in the
laboratory, cleverness and patience are prime attributes. Research often
involves tests, failures, retests, and so on for long periods of time (see
Figure 1.5). Research engineers therefore are often discouraged and
frustrated and must strain their abilities and rely on their self-confidence
in order to sustain their efforts to a successful conclusion.
Page 10
1.4.2 Development
Using existing knowledge and new discoveries from research, the
development engineer attempts to produce a functional device, structure,
or process (see Figure 1.6). Building and testing scale or pilot models is the
primary means by which the development engineer evaluates ideas. This
has been made easier to accomplish with 3-D modeling software, rapid
prototyping equipment, and virtual reality software and visualization tools.
A major portion of development work requires use of well-known devices
and processes in conjunction with established theories. Thus reading
available literature and having a solid background in the sciences and in
engineering principles are necessary for the engineer’s success.
Figure 1.6 Development engineers take an idea and
produce a concept of a functional product or system. The
result of this activity is passed on to the design engineers for
completing necessary details for production.
GaudiLab/Shutterstock
Many people who suffer from heart irregularities are able to function
normally today because of the pacemaker, an electronic device that
maintains a regular heartbeat. The pacemaker is an excellent example of
the work of development engineers. The first pacemakers developed in the
1950s were externally AC-powered units that sent pulses of energy through
an implanted lead wire to the heart. However, the power requirement for
heart stimulus was so great that patients suffered severe burns on their
chests. As improvements were studied, research in surgery and electronics
enabled development engineers to devise a battery-powered external
pacemaker that eliminated concerns about chest burns and allowed the
patients more mobility. Although more efficient from the standpoint of
power requirements, the devices were uncomfortable, and patients
frequently suffered infection where the wires entered the chest. Finally,
two independent teams developed the first internal pacemaker, eight years
after the original pacemaker had been tested. Their experience and
research with tiny pulse generators for spacecraft led to this achievement.
But the very fine wire used in these early models proved to be inadequate
and quite often failed, forcing patients to have the entire pacemaker
replaced. A team of engineers at General Electric developed a pacemaker
that incorporated a new wire, called a helicable. The helicable consisted of
49 strands of wire coiled together and then wound into a spring. The
spring diameter was about 46 μm, one-half the diameter of a human hair.
Thus, with doctors and development engineers working together, an
effective, comfortable device was perfected that has enabled many heart
patients to enjoy a more active life.
Page 11
Page 12
To illustrate how important technological changes can arise from the
work of development engineers, here’s what’s become of the pacemaker.
Today pacemakers have been developed by engineers and doctors to
operate at more than one speed, enabling the patient to speed up or slow
down heart rate depending on physical activity. Motion sensors are used to
detect breathing rate and can be programmed by the doctor for individual
needs. The new pager-sized pacemakers are also now programmed to act
as sensors to detect problems with intermittent atrial fibrillation and
switch the pacemaker to a different mode that paces the lower heart
chamber only. For those with damage to the heart muscles and the heart’s
electrical systems, the new biventricular pacemaker can pace both of the
lower heart chambers so that they beat at the same rate. In addition to the
advances in pacemakers, medical research has evolved many other
procedures for correcting heart deficiencies. The field of electrophysiology,
combining cardiology with electrical and computer engineering, is enabling
thousands of persons with heart irregularities to live productive and happy
lives.
We have discussed the pacemaker in detail to point out that important
changes in technology can arise from the work of development engineers.
That it took only 13 years to develop an efficient, dependable pacemaker,
five years to develop the transistor, and 25 years to develop the digital
computer indicates that modern engineering methods generate and
improve products nearly as fast as research generates new knowledge.
Successful development engineers are ingenious and creative. Astute
judgment often is required in devising models that can be used to
determine whether a project will be successful in performance and
economical in production. Obtaining an advanced degree is helpful, but
not as important as it is for an engineer who will be working in research.
Practical experience more than anything else produces the qualities
necessary for a career as a development engineer.
Development engineers frequently are asked to demonstrate that an
idea will work. Within certain limits they do not work out the exact
specifications that a final product should possess. Such matters are usually
left to the design engineer if the idea is deemed feasible.
1.4.3 Design
The development engineer produces a concept or model that is passed on
to the design engineer for converting into a device, process, or structure
(see Figure 1.7). The designer relies on education and experience to
evaluate many possible design options, keeping in mind the cost of
manufacture, ease of production, availability of materials, and
performance requirements. Usually several designs and redesigns will be
undertaken before the product is brought before the general public.
To illustrate the role that the design engineer plays, we will discuss the
development of the side air bags for added safety in automobiles. Side air
bags created something of a design problem, as designers had to decide
where and how the air bags would be fastened to the car body. They had to
determine what standard parts could be used and what parts had to be
designed from scratch. Consideration was given to how to hide the air bags
so not to take away from the aesthetics of the interior of the car while still
providing maximum impact safety. Materials to be used for attaching the
air bags to the frame and for the air bag itself had to be selected. An
inflation device had to be designed that would give flawless performance.
Page 13
The 12 000 or so other parts that form the modern automobile also
demand numerous considerations: Optimum placement of engine
accessories, comfortable design of seats, maximization of trunk space, and
aesthetically pleasing body design all require thousands of engineering
hours if the model is to be successful in a highly competitive industry.
Like the development engineer, the designer is creative. But where the
development engineer is usually concerned only with a prototype or model,
the designer is restricted by the state of the art in engineering materials,
production facilities, and, perhaps most important, economic
Other documents randomly have
different content
difficult of access than that of Westminster.
It was here that it was decided that the
Flemings, who had flocked over during the
last reign, should leave the country. Among
them was William of Ypres whom Stephen
had made Earl of Kent. We hear very little
of the King’s personal relations with the
citizens, by whom he was respected as
befits one of whom it is written that he was
“pitiful to the poor, liberal to all men, that
he took of his subjects but seldom times
any great tributes, and, further, that he was
careful above all things to have the laws
duly executed and justice uprightly
administered on all hands.”
In the year 1170 Henry II. had his eldest
son Henry crowned King; but the “Young
King,” as he was called, never lived to
occupy his father’s place; after a career of
rebellion he died of a fever in 1183.
Henry’s Charter gave the citizens
privileges and liberties as large as those
granted by Henry I.—with one or two
important exceptions. The opening clause in
the former Charter was as follows:—
As for the hatred of the people for the Jews, I think that it had
nothing whatever to do with their money-lending, for the simple
reason that they had no dealings with them. The common people
never borrowed money of the Jews, because they had no security to
offer and no want of money except for their daily bread. Those who
borrowed of the Jews were the Barons, who strengthened or
repaired or rebuilt their castles; the Bishop, who wanted to carry on
his cathedral or to build a church; the Abbot, who had works to
execute upon the monastery estates, or a church to beautify. The
great Lords of the Church and the Realm were the borrowers; and
we do not find that they murdered the Jews. The popular hatred
was purely religious. The Jew was an unbeliever: when no one was
looking at him he spat upon the Cross; when he dared he kidnapped
children and crucified them; he it was who crucified our Lord, and
would do so again if he could. Why, the King was going off to the
East to kill infidels, and here were infidels at home. Why not begin
by killing them first? So the people reasoned, quite logically, on
these premisses.
To return to the coronation of Richard I. For fear of magic it was
ordered that no Jew and no woman should be allowed admission to
the Abbey Church during the function. Unfortunately, the Jews,
hoping to conciliate the new Sovereign with gifts, assembled outside
the gates and endeavoured to gain admission. It was always
characteristic of the Jews, especially in times of persecution, that
they never in the least understood the intensity of hatred with which
they were regarded by the world. One would think that on such an
occasion common prudence would have kept them at home. Not so,
they endeavoured to force their way into the Hall during the
Coronation Banquet, but they were roughly driven back, and the
rumour ran that the King had ordered them to be put to death; so
they were cudgelled, stoned, struck with knives, chased to their
houses, which were then set on fire. From mid-day till two of the
clock on the following day the mob continued to murder, to pillage,
and to destroy.
It is noted that at Richard’s Coronation Banquet the Chief
Magistrate of London, not yet Mayor, officiated as Butler, an office
claimed in the following reigns from that precedent.
When Richard prepared for his Crusade he ordered the City to
furnish a certain quantity of armour, spears, knives, tents, etc., for
the use of his army, together with wine, silken habits, and other
things for his own use.
On the departure of Richard for Palestine his Chancellor, William
Longchamp, Bishop of Ely, took up his residence in the Tower. Power
turned his head; he acted like one whose position is safe, and
authority unbounded. He annoyed the citizens by constructing a
moat round the Tower, and by including within the external wall of
the Tower a piece of land here and another there, a mill which
belonged to St. Katherine’s Hospital, and a garden belonging to the
City. He offended the Bishops by seizing his brother Regent, Bishop
Pudsey; and the Barons by insulting Geoffrey, Archbishop of York,
the son of Fair Rosamond. Thereafter, when John, at the head of a
large army, summoned him to justify himself at Reading, Longchamp
closed the gates of the Tower.
John proceeded to ascertain the disposition of the leading citizens
of London. On the one hand Longchamp was the representative of
the King, appointed by the King, to whom obedience was due. On
the other hand, he had exasperated the citizens beyond endurance.
They were ready—but with exceptions—to transfer their allegiance
to John—always as the King’s representative. And here they saw
their opportunity for making terms with John to their own
advantage. Why not ask for the Commune? They did so. They made
the granting of the Commune the condition of John’s admission into
the City, and therefore of Longchamp’s disgrace. Should John refuse
they would close their gates and support the Chancellor. But John
accepted.
He rode from Reading into London accompanied by the
Archbishop of Rouen and a great number of Bishops, Earls, and
Barons. He was met by the citizens. The gates were thrown open;
and John’s army sat down to besiege the Tower from the City and
from the outside. This done, he called a council in the Chapel House
of St. Paul’s and there solemnly conceded the Commune, upon
which the citizens took oath of obedience to him, subject to the
rights of the King. The meaning of this concession will be found
more fully considered later on. At present it is sufficient to observe
that it was followed by the election of the first Mayor of London: that
other towns hastened to get the same recognition: and that the
Commune, though never formally withdrawn by Richard himself, was
never allowed by him.
Two Charters were granted to the City by Richard. The first, dated
April 23, 1194, was an exact copy of his father’s Charter, with the
same omission as to the election of Sheriff and Justiciar. It is not
addressed to the Mayor, because Richard never recognised that
office, but, as the Charter of Henry II. and that of Henry I., “To the
Archbishops, Bishops, Abbots, Earls, Barons, Justices, Sheriffs,
Ministers, and all others his faithful Friends and English people.”
The second Charter of July 14, 1197, authorised the removal of all
weirs in the River: “For it is manifest to us ... that great determent
and discommodity have grown to our City of London and also to the
whole realm by reason of the said wears.”
We now arrive at the first intimation of an articulate discontent
among the people. In all times those “who have not” regard those
“who have” with envy and disfavour; from time to time, generally
when the conditions of society seem to make partition possible, this
hatred shows itself openly. In the year 1195, there first arose among
the people a leader who became the voice of their discontent: he
flourished for a while upon their favour; in the end he met with the
usual fate of those who rely upon the gratitude and the support of
the people. (See vol. ii. pt. i. ch. vi.)
In the year 1198 the Sheriffs of London and Middlesex were
ordered by the King to provide standards of weight, length, and
measures to be sent into all the Counties.
Richard was received by the City, on his return from captivity, with
the greatest show of rejoicing; the houses being so decorated as to
move the astonishment of the “Lords of Almaine” who rode with the
King.
“When they saw the great riches,” Holinshed
writes, “which the Londoners shewed in that
triumphant receiuing of their souereigne lord and
king, they maruelled greatlie thereat, insomuch
that one of them said unto him:‘Surelie, oh King,
your people are wise and subtile, which doo
nothing doubt to shew the beautiful shine of their
riches now that they have receiued you home, CROSS OF KNIGHT
whereas before they seemed to bewaile their TEMPLAR
need and povertie, whilest you remained in
captiuitie. For verelie if the emperor had understood that the riches
of the realme had bin such, neither would he have beene persuaded
that England could have been made bare of wealth, neither yet
should you so lightlie have escaped his hands without the paiment of
a more huge and intollerable ransome.’” (Vol. iii. p. 142, 1586
edition.)
The whole period of Richard’s residence in London, or, indeed, in
England, was limited to a few weeks after his coronation and a few
weeks after his return from captivity.
CHAPTER III
JOHN
John granted five Charters to the City.
By the first of these Charters, June 17, 1199, he confirmed the
City in the liberties which they had enjoyed under King Henry II.
By the third Charter, July 5, 1199,
he went farther: he gave back to the
citizens the rights they had obtained
from Henry I., viz. the farm of
Middlesex for a payment of £300
sterling every year, and the right of
electing their own sheriffs. This
seemed a great concession, but was
not in reality very great, for the
existence of a Mayor somewhat
lessened the importance of the
Sheriffs.
The second Charter confirmed
previous laws as to the conservation
of the Thames and its Fisheries.
The fourth Charter, March 20, 1202,
disfranchised the Weavers’ Guild.
The fifth Charter, May 9, 1215,
granted the right of the City to
appoint a Mayor. Now there had been KING JOHN (1167(?)-1216)
already a Mayor for many years, but From the effigy in Worcester Cathedral.
he had not been formally recognised
by the King, and this Charter recognised his existence. The right
involved the establishment of the Commune, that is to say, the
association of all the burghers alike for the purpose of protecting
their common interests. It was no longer, for instance, the Merchant
Guild which regulated trade as a whole; nor an association of Trade
Guilds: nor was it an association of City Barons: nor was it a tribunal
of Justice: it was simply the association of the burghers as a body.
We are now, however, approaching that period of the City History
in which was carried on the long struggle between the aristocratic
party and the crafts for power. In this place it is only necessary to
indicate the beginning of the strife. The parties were first the Barons
and Aldermen, owners of the City manors; secondly, the merchants,
some of whom belonged to the City aristocracy; and, lastly, the craft.
The Chief Magistrate of the Commune held a position of great power
and importance. It was necessary for the various parties to
endeavour to secure this post for a man of their own side.
HENRY FITZAILWYN, KNT., FIRST LORD MAYOR OF LONDON
From an old print.
ebookmasss.com