Skip to content

Conversation

@gurdiga
Copy link
Contributor

@gurdiga gurdiga commented Jan 14, 2016

This is a follow up on #505.

@frvge Please take a quick look.

@frvge
Copy link
Contributor

frvge commented Jan 18, 2016

Looks good to me. I'd like some more input by others before merging.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To match the bit below, I'd change this to:

Using an attribute selector qualified by an ID should not result in a warning

I'd also move it to be nearer to line 38 test since they go together.

@stubbornella
Copy link
Member

I added some feedback re: clarity in the tests, but otherwise it looks good to me.

@gurdiga
Copy link
Contributor Author

gurdiga commented Jan 20, 2016

All right, thank you for checking this out! 8-)

@frvge frvge added this to the 1.0.0 milestone Jan 26, 2016
frvge added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2016
Selectors containing #id or .class are considered to be qualified
@frvge frvge merged commit 8573e45 into CSSLint:master Jan 26, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants