Skip to content

Conversation

@mgol
Copy link
Member

@mgol mgol commented May 26, 2016

jQuery 2.0.3 fixed very few things from 2.0.2, the list is here:
http://blog.jquery.com/2013/07/03/jquery-1-10-2-and-2-0-3-released/

One of the fixes was ​http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/13980, though which was
about cross-domain iframe issues. The problem is TestSwarm loads a cross-domain
iframe: the main page is swarm.jquery.org, the frame is on
builds.jenkins.jquery.com so it might be causing issues. You can see jQuery UI
tests are timing out in all IE versions in jQuery 2.0.2:
http://swarm.jquery.org/job/2918

The problem is that it doesn't just fail, it starves the available IE pool,
making it sometimes harder for other projects to get their tests run on IE.

That's why tests with jQuery 2.0.2 on TestSwarm need to be removed as it's been
done with 1.10.1.

Refs #12745
Refs c2224bf
Refs gh-1706

jQuery 2.0.3 fixed very few things from 2.0.2, the list is here:
​http://blog.jquery.com/2013/07/03/jquery-1-10-2-and-2-0-3-released/

One of the fixes was ​http://bugs.jquery.com/ticket/13980, though which was
about cross-domain iframe issues. The problem is TestSwarm loads a cross-domain
iframe: the main page is swarm.jquery.org, the frame is on
builds.jenkins.jquery.com so it might be causing issues. You can see jQuery UI
tests are timing out in all IE versions in jQuery 2.0.2:
​http://swarm.jquery.org/job/2918

The problem is that it doesn't just fail, it starves the available IE pool,
making it sometimes harder for other projects to get their tests run on IE.

That's why tests with jQuery 2.0.2 on TestSwarm need to be removed as it's been
done with 1.10.1.

Refs #12745
Refs c2224bf
Refs jquerygh-1706
@mention-bot
Copy link

By analyzing the blame information on this pull request, we identified @jzaefferer, @gnarf and @scottgonzalez to be potential reviewers

@mgol
Copy link
Member Author

mgol commented May 26, 2016

An example problematic run: http://swarm.jquery.org/job/2918.

@mgol mgol deleted the bad-2.0.2 branch May 26, 2016 13:16
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants