Skip to content

No action needed: noService positional arg is already valid Java#93

Closed
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomm/service_alert_effect_no_servicefrom
copilot/sub-pr-92
Closed

No action needed: noService positional arg is already valid Java#93
Copilot wants to merge 1 commit intomm/service_alert_effect_no_servicefrom
copilot/sub-pr-92

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Mar 18, 2026

A bot suggested changing the noService argument to use named parameter syntax (noService = noService), which is Kotlin-only and invalid in Java. The code already passes noService as a correct positional argument — no change was required.

  • Confirmed GTFSRealTimeProvider.java:1130 already uses plain positional noService, not named-parameter syntax
  • No code change needed — responded to review thread clarifying the distinction

💬 Send tasks to Copilot coding agent from Slack and Teams to turn conversations into code. Copilot posts an update in your thread when it's finished.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] [WIP] Address feedback on NO_SERVICE effect implementation in Java No action needed: noService positional arg is already valid Java Mar 18, 2026
Copilot AI requested a review from mmathieum March 18, 2026 21:39
@mmathieum mmathieum closed this Mar 19, 2026
@mmathieum mmathieum deleted the copilot/sub-pr-92 branch March 19, 2026 00:45
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants