Skip to content

[css-align] 'width: auto' turning into 'fit-content' isn't compatible with existing behavior #1437

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
dbaron opened this issue May 22, 2017 · 0 comments

Comments

@dbaron
Copy link
Member

dbaron commented May 22, 2017

As @MatsPalmgren points out on Bugzilla, the sentence at the end of the definition of justify-self:

Values other than stretch cause a width/height of auto to be treated as fit-content.

combined with the rules for justify-self on blocks mean that the spec makes the default behavior for blocks to be fit-content sizing rather than stretch sizing, which is not compatible with the existing behavior of blocks in the normal flow.

@dbaron dbaron added the css-align-3 Current Work label May 22, 2017
triple-underscore added a commit to triple-underscore/triple-underscore.github.io that referenced this issue Jun 28, 2017
Use physical left/right as well as line-relative left/right for mapping
left/right keywords. w3c/csswg-drafts#1403
w3c/csswg-drafts@93ee87ca370963205c93c915b2b73
0c3a308a142

Fix the Values section to be more up-to-date.
Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1397 .
w3c/csswg-drafts@ec8e2818c6d443374d2acc3bc9d1a
c3ba1933da6

Use more explicit terminology for the axis used by static-pos *-self.
Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1443 .
w3c/csswg-drafts@b649337df3e4c192bec005f905e8d
49417d1af68

Block's justify-self:normal should act like 'stretch', not 'start'.
Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1437 .
w3c/csswg-drafts@4277c9e5e124445a73612ab07b98b
d0449968c8b

Actually specify how 'normal' aligns grid items.
Fixes w3c/csswg-drafts#1433 .
w3c/csswg-drafts@da03cd965eea014c3c8002bf8ee15
da700f2ebba

+ flex-end 値 周りの訳抜け修正
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants