Pluralize `feature-*` to `features-*`?

[svgeesus]

Originally raised by @jfkthame :

(3) A really minor issue, but I have found myself repeatedly writing things like @supports font-tech(features-opentype), and not getting the expected result because the correct keyword is feature-opentype (singular). To my mind, the feature-* keywords would read more naturally in the plural form (similarly to font-tech(variations)). Should we change them to plural, here and in CSS Fonts, before this is widely implemented and webcompat becomes a constraint?

[drott]

Yes, I support this. I would even hope we can consider this a minor editing change and proceed with it. @litherum @jfkthame ?

[svgeesus]

I think it reads better as the plural, too

[svgeesus]

This change would also affect CSS Fonts 4 and 5 because obviously we would want consistency between Conditional and Fonts specs..

[svgeesus]

Ok I am going to call this, because in 11.1. Font tech it says (note the plural)

The features-opentype, features-aat and features-graphite techs refer to support for font features, commonly implemented in [OPENTYPE] with the GSUB and the GPOS tables, as well as in [AAT-FEATURES] using the morx and kerx tables and [GRAPHITE] with the Silf, Glat , Gloc , Feat and Sill tables as documented in the Graphite Table Format.

[svgeesus]

it is already plural in Conditional 5

[drott]

Thanks, Chris.