-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 711
[css-backgrounds-4] Decide on name for shorthand covering everything background-*
except background-color
#9083
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comments
Copying from #8726 (comment) What about
Copying from #8726 (comment) I think it's worth noting that we have a similar pattern of properties for |
I still slightly prefer the initially suggested I am ruling out some for myself here, which I think don't fit well.
Sebastian |
To make progress on this, let's get some straw poll for the different suggestions. As there are many, I'll split them up into several comments. Please add your name besides the entry your prefer or add your vote to the comment. (I've added the names of members who expressed their opinion on one of the proposals in #8726.)
|
Note that I explicitly left out |
I will object to adding |
|
We went with (I think |
I want to point out that all list-valued properties so far have singular names, e.g. What I do have a strong opinion about is the lack of votings so far. It would be great if we got some more opinions on this, so we can resolve on a name. Sebastian |
I'm also voting for |
In #8726 we resolved to add a shorthand for
background-*
minusbackground-color
.We didn't decide on its name yet, though. I already listed the current suggestions in the other issue, but here they are again:
background-layer
background-overlay
background-stack
background-list
background-canvas
background-pattern
background-sheet
background-screen
background-cover
background-slice
background-image-stack
background-media
background-image-list
background-image-layer
Straw poll (split into two comments due to the amount of suggestions):
#9083 (comment)
#9083 (comment)
Sebastian
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: