-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 802
All issues
Issue creation is restricted in this repository
Issues
is:issue author:dbaron label:"Closed Accepted as Editorial"
is:issue author:dbaron label:"Closed Accepted as Editorial"
Search results
[css-values] add 'revert' and 'revert-layer' to list of CSS-wide keywords
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-values-4Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#7439 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-values] Should define the terms "device pixels" and "raster pixels"
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-values-4Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#7287 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-contain] it should be clearer that size containment inhibits effects of contents on intrinsic sizes
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.Closed Accepted by CSSWG ResolutionChanges backed by a CSSWG resolution.Changes backed by a CSSWG resolution.css-contain-2Current WorkCurrent WorkTestedMemory aid - issue has WPT testsMemory aid - issue has WPT testsStatus: Closed (completed).#4741 In w3c/csswg-drafts;"Applies to: all elements" should mean the property applies to ::before and ::after
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-cascade-4Current WorkCurrent Workcss-pseudo-4Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1861 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Rename section on Baseline Alignment Terminology
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1451 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] rules on synthesizing baselines are split across two sections
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1450 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] "passed to" wording in Default Alignment section is strange
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1448 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Axis rule for align-self/justify-self on static-position of abspos boxes not fully defined
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1443 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Two issues with "Values other than stretch" sentence
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Open.#1431 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] details for justify-self on blocks should refer to margin properties, not offset properties
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1427 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] "effectively aligns its start (end) edge with the other boxes in its baseline-sharing group" is confusing
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1424 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] "whichever matches its inline axis" is ambiguous
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1423 In w3c/csswg-drafts;