Search results

[css-align] verify that other changes weren't inadvertently reverted

Closed Accepted as Obvious Bugfix

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#2934 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Aug 9, 2018

[css-align] Should be clearer that baseline table is generated by element establishing alignment context

Closed Accepted as Obvious Bugfix

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1452 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 15, 2017

[css-align] Rename section on Baseline Alignment Terminology

Closed Accepted as Editorial

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1451 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 15, 2017

[css-align] rules on synthesizing baselines are split across two sections

Closed Accepted as Editorial

Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1450 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 15, 2017

[css-align] should 'place-items' accept 'legacy' values?

Closed Accepted by CSSWG Resolution

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1449 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 28, 2017

[css-align] "passed to" wording in Default Alignment section is strange

Closed Accepted as Editorial

Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1448 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jul 19, 2017

[css-align] baseline self-alignment can increase intrinsic size of containing block, not self

Closed Accepted as Obvious Bugfix

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1447 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 15, 2017

[css-align] 'place-self' and 'place-items' properties don't allow <overflow-position> values

Closed Accepted as Obvious Bugfix

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1446 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 15, 2017

[css-align] 'place-content' Value line should indicate second value is optional

Closed Accepted as Obvious Bugfix

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1445 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 21, 2017

[css-align] Add note about intent not to change CSS 2.1's default behavior

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1444 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 15, 2017

[css-align] Axis rule for align-self/justify-self on static-position of abspos boxes not fully defined

Closed Accepted as Editorial

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1443 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 27, 2017

[css-align] 'width: auto' turning into 'fit-content' isn't compatible with existing behavior

Closed Accepted as Obvious Bugfix

css-align-3Current WorkCurrent Work

Status: Closed (completed).

#1437 In w3c/csswg-drafts;

· by dbaron was closed on Jun 27, 2017