-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 802
All issues
Issue creation is restricted in this repository
Issues
is:issue label:css-align-3 author:dbaron
is:issue label:css-align-3 author:dbaron
Search results
[css-align] verify that other changes weren't inadvertently reverted
Closed Accepted as Obvious BugfixFixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.Fixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#2934 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Should be clearer that baseline table is generated by element establishing alignment context
Closed Accepted as Obvious BugfixFixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.Fixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1452 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Rename section on Baseline Alignment Terminology
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1451 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] rules on synthesizing baselines are split across two sections
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1450 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] should 'place-items' accept 'legacy' values?
Closed Accepted by CSSWG ResolutionChanges backed by a CSSWG resolution.Changes backed by a CSSWG resolution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1449 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] "passed to" wording in Default Alignment section is strange
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.Commenter SatisfiedCommenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.Commenter has indicated satisfaction with the resolution / edits.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1448 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] baseline self-alignment can increase intrinsic size of containing block, not self
Closed Accepted as Obvious BugfixFixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.Fixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1447 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] 'place-self' and 'place-items' properties don't allow <overflow-position> values
Closed Accepted as Obvious BugfixFixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.Fixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1446 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] 'place-content' Value line should indicate second value is optional
Closed Accepted as Obvious BugfixFixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.Fixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1445 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Add note about intent not to change CSS 2.1's default behavior
css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1444 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] Axis rule for align-self/justify-self on static-position of abspos boxes not fully defined
Closed Accepted as EditorialNo substantive change.No substantive change.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1443 In w3c/csswg-drafts;[css-align] 'width: auto' turning into 'fit-content' isn't compatible with existing behavior
Closed Accepted as Obvious BugfixFixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.Fixed an obvious error with the obvious solution.css-align-3Current WorkCurrent WorkStatus: Closed (completed).#1437 In w3c/csswg-drafts;