Skip to content

[css-values-5] Don't use flat tree for tree-counting #9562 #12144

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 2, 2025
Merged

[css-values-5] Don't use flat tree for tree-counting #9562 #12144

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
061d700
[css-values-5] Don't use flat tree for tree-counting #9562
lilles May 2, 2025
34a8ab7
Update css-values-5/Overview.bs
tabatkins May 2, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions css-values-5/Overview.bs
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -2755,7 +2755,7 @@ Tree Counting Functions: the ''sibling-count()'' and ''sibling-index()'' notatio
as an <<integer>>,
the index of the element
on which the notation is used
among the children of its parent.
among its [=inclusive siblings=].
Like '':nth-child()'',
''sibling-index()'' is 1-indexed.

Expand Down Expand Up @@ -2803,9 +2803,9 @@ Tree Counting Functions: the ''sibling-count()'' and ''sibling-index()'' notatio

</div>

Note: Like the rest of CSS (other than [=selectors=]),
''sibling-count()'' and ''sibling-index()''
operate on the [=flat tree=].
Note: These functions, to match [=selectors=] like '':nth-child()'', operate on the DOM tree,
rather than the [=flat tree] like most CSS values do.
They may, in the future, have variants that support counting [=flat tree=] siblings.

Note: These functions may, in the future,
be extended to accept an ''of <<complex-real-selector-list>>'' argument,
Expand Down