[css-text-3][css-text-4] Re-introduce dfn for word-wrap - #14059
Merged
Conversation
The `word-wrap` property was moved out of the definition table (addressing issue w3c#11544). But the property still needs to be defined somewhere for references to it to keep working, and for crawling tools to understand that it is a legacy name alias of `overflow-wrap`. This adds back the missing `<dfn property>` to re-create the definition and fix the references to `word-wrap` that the specs contain.
frivoal
approved these changes
Jun 19, 2026
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The
word-wrapproperty was moved out of the definition table (addressing issue #11544). But the property still needs to be defined somewhere for references to it to keep working, and for crawling tools to understand that it is a legacy name alias ofoverflow-wrap.This adds back the missing
<dfn property>to re-create the definition and fix the references toword-wrapthat the specs contain.Feel free to proceed otherwise and put the
<dfn>elsewhere. The issue here is that there needs to remain a<dfn>for the property somewhere.