Skip to content

Conversation

@romandev
Copy link
Member

WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins [1]. This
replaces the existing [NoInterfaceObject] and "implements" syntax with
"interface mixin" and "includes" in the appropriate places.

This fixes #1931, #1932 issues.

Test: web-platform-tests/wpt#8772

[1] whatwg/webidl@45e8173

WebIDL recently introduced dedicated syntax for mixins [1]. This
replaces the existing [NoInterfaceObject] and "implements" syntax with
"interface mixin" and "includes" in the appropriate places.

This fixes w3c#1931, w3c#1932 issues.

[1] whatwg/webidl@45e8173
@dstorey
Copy link
Member

dstorey commented Mar 12, 2018

@tabatkins who would be best to review this and get merged?

@tabatkins
Copy link
Member

I can do it, I've just been behind on PRs. Will get to this soon.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[cssom] Update WebIDL definition(s) to use new mixin syntax

4 participants