Skip to content

Conversation

@andruud
Copy link
Member

@andruud andruud commented Aug 21, 2020

Follow-up to #5263, which specifies that a "missing" source shall
result in using the Document's scrollingElement, but if we give
source a default value of null, it can never be missing.

…source

Follow-up to w3c#5263, which specifies that a "missing" source shall
result in using the Document's scrollingElement, but if we give
source a default value of null, it can never be missing.
@andruud
Copy link
Member Author

andruud commented Aug 21, 2020

cc @flackr

@andruud
Copy link
Member Author

andruud commented Oct 23, 2020

No response from @flackr, can you have a look at this @ogerchikov?

Copy link
Contributor

@flackr flackr left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, sorry for the delay on this

@ogerchikov
Copy link
Collaborator

Looks good.

@tabatkins tabatkins merged commit 11bd99c into w3c:master Nov 11, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants