Introduction to Language 10th Edition Fromkin Solutions Manual pdf download
Introduction to Language 10th Edition Fromkin Solutions Manual pdf download
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-language-10th-
edition-fromkin-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-language-australia-
and-new-zealand-8th-edition-fromkin-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-language-australia-
and-new-zealand-9th-edition-fromkin-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/introduction-to-psychology-10th-
edition-plotnik-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/essentials-of-federal-
taxation-2018-edition-9th-edition-spilker-test-bank/
Nutrition for Health Fitness and Sport 10th Edition
Williams Test Bank
https://testbankfan.com/product/nutrition-for-health-fitness-and-
sport-10th-edition-williams-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/principles-of-information-
security-4th-edition-whitman-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/using-intuit-quickbooks-
premier-2017-1st-edition-heaney-solutions-manual/
https://testbankfan.com/product/public-finance-and-public-policy-5th-
edition-gruber-test-bank/
https://testbankfan.com/product/starting-out-with-java-early-
objects-6th-edition-gaddis-solutions-manual/
Accounting Information for Business Decisions 1st Edition
Cunningham Solutions Manual
https://testbankfan.com/product/accounting-information-for-business-
decisions-1st-edition-cunningham-solutions-manual/
Random documents with unrelated
content Scribd suggests to you:
Well Stream was an ancient appellation of the Wisbeach river. He
further adds, that this outfall, or arm of the sea, had Holland and a
part of the Isle on one side, and Marshland on the other; these were
defended from it by great sea-banks, which in the time of Henry VI
were ordained to be made and maintained fifty feet high. Hither of
old resorted (he says) ships and vessels of great burden. But the
sea, still forsaking the Isle, made the whole passage between
Wisbeach and the Washes high marshes and sands; and by the
decay of the river, the channel, or outfall, became so shallow and
weak, as to admit of people often going over on foot, bare legged
under the knees. He also imputes much blame to the people about
Wisbeach, in not scouring and dyking the river, as by ancient laws
and presentments they ought to have done; and not preserving and
maintaining the petty sewers and drains. In consequence of these
omissions, not only the fens were drowned, but the means were also
lost of draining 13 or 14000 acres of inland grounds, the support of
three or four towns on the North of Wisbeach.
That the bad effects of the desertion of the Ouse and Nene from
their ancient outfall at Wisbeach, soon became very grievous to that
town and the adjacent country, appears by the frequent complaints
made, and laws enacted for their relief. Some of those laws were
made in the reign of Henry VI, and measures were taken, it seems,
in consequence of them, for the relief and benefit of the sufferers.
The most important and beneficial of all those measures appears to
be that adopted toward the latter part of the 15th century under the
direction of bishop Morton. [18] “That prelate finding (says Atkins)
that beside its being a very chargeable course to his people of the
hundred of Wisbeach, once in four or five years to dyke this river,
and that notwithstanding this dyking of the river, the outfall below to
the seaward nevertheless decayed; and finding that without a great
head of fresh waters, to scour both the river and the outfall, all
would be lost, took a part of Hercules’ labour upon him, and strove
to bring in great abundance of fresh waters, by divers courses, out
of the Fens, to maintain this channel: viz. the rivers Nene and
Welland from Southea, and the river of the great cross, or
Plantwater, from the united branches of Nene and Ouse, descending
by Benwick.” But the bishop’s principal undertaking seems to have
been the cut of 14 miles, from Peterborough to Guyhorn, by which a
large portion of the Nene was brought down to Wisbeach, and
proved of up small benefit to that town and harbour, as well as to
the drainage of the country. This cut has transmitted the bishop’s
name deservedly and honourably to posterity; it being ever since
known and distinguished under the denomination of Morton’s Leam.
Happy had it been for the world, if all those of his order had
deserved so well of their neighbours and of their country. [19]
“By this doing” (says Atkins, referring to the works of bishop Morton)
“Wisbeach Fens were made good Sheep pastures, and the fall of the
water at Wisbeach became so great, that no man would adventure
under the bridge, with a boat, but by veering through, &c. But
succeeding ages (he further observes) neglecting these good
provisions, have thereby lost the benefit.” The blame of this neglect,
both Atkins and Sir Clement Edmunds seem to lay entirely on the
total want of public spirit, or the selfish and sordid disposition of the
people of Wisbeach, who strove at all events to avoid the expence,
alleging that the benefit of cleansing and dyking the outfall would
altogether accrue to the behoof of the upland country, and therefore
that they [the inhabitants of the said upland country] ought to put
their hands to the work, and contribute towards it in some
reasonable measure. The uplanders, on the other hand, produced
divers presentments, some of them as high as Henry VI, shewing,
that they ought not to be charged; at the same time expressing a
willingness to yield a reasonable aid, when the work was done, if it
proved serviceable. But those of Wisbeach required a previous
contribution, to be expended as the work should proceed. Their
selfishness and perverseness, on these occasions, carried them, it
seems, to very extravagant and ridiculous lengths, to elude the
charge: “one while saying, they cared not if Wisbeach were a dry
town; another while by thinking to keep it as a standing pool; [and
again] another while enforcing [or urging] the making of a Sluice
between the town and the sea, that the tide should not silt up the
river, saying that otherwise the charge of dyking the river would be
but cast away.—And to the charge of this Sluice they would call in
the high-country people, such as they knew would not easily be
brought to it, so that nothing might be done.” This preposterous
conduct of the Wisbeachers appears to have effectually frustrated
every reasonable and salutary proposal. Atkins, however, gives it as
his firm opinion, “that were there in the Isle of Ely again another
bishop Morton the country might well be regained by such means as
might be easily set down.” [21a] But it does not appear that another
bishop Morton has yet risen in the Isle, whatever may be said of the
regeneration, reformation, or amendment of the good people of
Wisbeach.
Nothing of any consequence appears to have been attempted since,
for the benefit of the port or navigation of Wisbeach, except
Kinderley’s Cut, made in 1721 and 1722, by order of the Board of
Adventurers, and not without the consent of the town of Wisbeach
likewise; only the adventurers [it seems] ought to have had their
consent under their hands: at least so says Mr Kinderly. This cut,
had it gone forward, would probably have been of great advantage
to the river. But by the time that it was completed, and a dam was
making across the old channel, to turn the river into the new one,
“the Wisbeach gentlemen, falsely, or by mistake, apprehending the
advantage of a wide indraught over all those spreading sands, and
complaining that this new cut was not wide enough, (though it was
wider than the river at Wisbeach by twenty feet) and that therefore
their river would immediately be choked up, and their navigation
lost. [So they now] violently opposed it, and raised the Country for
demolishing the works; and after that obtained an injunction from
the Lord Chancellor to stop all further progress.” [21b] A long
vexatious Law Suit ensued, but the Adventures could not recover the
Money they had laid out, amounting to nearly £2000, and the
gentlemen of Wisbeach gave ample proof that they still inherited, in
full measure, the genuine spirit of their ancestors, before
mentioned. Their Harbour has been for some years in a most
miserable state, and seems to stand in need of the aid of a Morton
or a Kinderly as much as ever.
Section IV.
Section V.
CHAP. II.
Of Marshland and the adjoining parts, or Great Fen Country.—
View of their situation and revolutions in remote ages, or Sketch
of their ancient history.
Section I.
Account of their state before and after the arrival of the Romans
—Character of that people—establishment of their power here—
improvements made by them in these parts.
As Lynn may be considered as the Capital or Metropolis of Marshland
and the Fens, it will not be improper to give here some account of
those remarkable districts from the earliest times. All this flat and
level country is thought to have been originally a vast forest, which
was afterwards in some measure cleared, and converted into good
cultivated land, fertile fields, rich pastures, and numerous habitations
of industrious men. After that however, it was, it seems, for no
short period, covered by the sea, occasioned, perhaps, by an
earthquake, or some such convulsive event, which might
considerably lower or sink the whole surface of the country, and so
make way for the violent influx of the ocean. The overflowing
waters in time gradually covering the original surface of the ground
with silt and sand to a very great depth, or rather height, would at
last recede. The present face of the country, composed of silt to a
vast depth,(and which seems no other than marine sediment)
confirms this hypothesis. Still however the parts next the sea, such
as Marshland and the low-lands on the eastern side of Lincolnshire
would remain as a great salt marsh, occasionally overflowed,
especially at spring-tides.—This seems to have been the case when
Julius Cæsar invaded this country, and when Claudius afterwards
reduced it to the state of a Roman Province.
The Romans, with all their faults, were certainly a wonderful people.
Like all other invaders and conquerors they were in general very
hard masters, and in some respects most vile oppressors and
tyrants. In other respects, however, they may be said to have been
eventually real benefactors to many, if not to most of the countries
and nations which they subdued, as they were the means of greatly
improving those countries, and of introducing among their
inhabitants the rudiments of useful knowledge, habits of industry,
and the laws of civilization.
Julius Cæsar’s invasion of Britain seems to have proved upon the
whole unsuccessful; for he withdrew to the continent, without being
able to effect its subjugation, or to retain the conquests which he is
supposed to have made; which may be thought to furnish a pretty
strong argument in favour of the independent spirit, and high
military character of the British nation at that time. Nor does it
appear that the Romans ever attempted to give our ancestors any
further disturbance afterward, till the reign of Claudius, whose
general, Aulus Plautius, a person of senatorial dignity, was the first
that established the power of that people, or gave them a firm
footing in this island. This was near a hundred years after the
retreat or departure of Julius Cæsar; and the success of Plautius is
said to have been chiefly or greatly owing to the bitter dissentions
which then raged among the British chieftains, some of whom had
invited the Romans hither, and afterward joined them against their
own country-men. Claudius himself came over sometime after, and
completed the conquest of a great part of South Britain, including, it
seems, the country of the Iceni, which comprehended the present
counties of Norfolk and Suffolk, with most, if not the whole of those
of Cambridge and Huntingdon, and probably some part of
Lincolnshire. So that the parts adjoining the Fens became subject to
the Romans among their earliest acquisitions in Britain. The
inhabitants of these parts are also said to have made the least
resistance to them, at first, of any of the British States, and
therefore to have been for sometime more highly favoured by them
than any of the rest. Claudius at his departure from this island,
which is said to have been in the year 43 of the Christian Era, left
here a considerable force under Plautius, Vespasian (afterwards
emperor) and other experienced and able Generals, who were
succeeded by others, no way their inferiors, in experience, ability, or
military fame; among whom were Ostorius Scapula, Suetonius
Paulinus, and Julius Agricola. Besides Julius Cæsar, Claudius, and
Vespasian, several others of the Roman emperors are said to have
spent some part of their time in this island; and particular Hadrian,
Severus, Constantius Chlorus, and his son Constantine the Great.
The latter is supposed to have been born here, and his mother is
said to have been a Briton. His father, as well as his predecessor
Severus, died at York, a place of no small consequence and celebrity
in those times.
After the country was reduced, and made a part or province of the
empire, the Romans soon began to view it as a very important
acquisition. Accordingly they set in good earnest about improving it;
and there are still to be seen numerous proofs and monuments of
their laborious, ingenious, and successful exertions. Among their
important improvements here were included the draining of the
Fens, and the embanking of the Marshes, to secure them against the
violence and destructive inroads of the ocean. Marshland and the
low lands of Lincolnshire, as was before observed, they found in the
miserable condition of a salt marsh, occasionally and frequently
overflowed by the tides. This country they secured by very strong
and extensive embankments, which bear their name to this day. [35a]
These improvements in the Fens and Marshes are said to have been
the works of a colony of foreigners, [35b] brought over, probably, from
Belgium, a country of a similar description, whose natives, from their
previous knowledge and habits, would be eminently fitted for such
employments. Not that those works can be supposed to have been
effected without the powerful co-operation of the native Britons,
who would sometimes loudly complain of the hardships they
endured in labours of this kind, imposed upon them by the Romans:
a plain proof that they bore their full share of them. Catus
Decianus, it seems, was the name of the Roman officer who had the
chief direction or superintendence of the improvements then
projected and carried on in the Fens. [36] He was probably the first
Roman Procurator of the province of the Iceni, and continued to be
so for many years. Some things recorded of him, during his
government here exhibit him in a very unamiable and detestable
light; and it may be presumed that he was an unfeeling and severe
task-master to the workmen whom he employed in the fens and
marshes, as well as elsewhere; so that we need not wonder that
they should sometimes loudly complain of the hardships they
underwent. The public works of which he had the direction and
superintendence seem, however, to have been carried on by him
with no small energy and effect, and to have been soon brought to a
state of considerable forwardness and perfection.
The Fens must have been in a very dismal state before the arrival of
the Romans; and their exertions, undoubtedly, wrought a mighty,
and most happy change in the face of the country. Houses, villages,
and towns would now appear in places that were before perfectly
desolate and dreary. At this period we may venture to date the
origin of Lynn; for it may be pretty safely concluded that it owes its
rise to the schemes formed by the Romans for the recovery and
improvement of these fens and marshes. It is also very probable,
not only that it was the first town built in these parts, on that
occasion, but also that it was built and inhabited by those foreign
colonists above mentioned, and derived its name from them. This
however is not the proper place for the further elucidation of this
point: our present business being with the history of the Fens.
Section II.
Section III.
The reader, it is hoped, will excuse, and even approve the length of
this curious extract, as it seems so well calculated to account for and
elucidate divers striking phenomena in the natural history of the
Fens.
Here it may not be improper further to observe, that the forest
above described seems to have extended from the coast of
Lincolnshire a considerable way along the Norfolk coast; as there is
on the shore, near Thornham in that county, at low water, the
appearance of a large forest having been, at some period, interred
and swallowed up by the waves. Stools of numerous large timber
trees, and many trunks, are to be seen, but so rotten, that they may
be penetrated by a spade. These lie in a black mass of vegetable
fibres, consisting of decayed branches, leaves, rushes, flags, &c.
The extent of this once sylvan tract [on the Norfolk coast] must have
been great, from what is discoverable; and at high water, now
covered by the tides, is in one spot from five to six-hundred acres.
No hint of the manner, or the time, in which this submersion
happened, can be traced. Nothing like a bog is near, and the whole
beach besides is composed of a fine ooze, or marine clay. [49]
Section IV.
Section V.
“That this vast level was at first a firm dry land, and not
annoyed with any extraordinary inundation by the sea, or
stagnation of fresh waters, is evident from the quantity of trees
that have been found buried in different parts of the fens, and
also from a variety of other circumstances.
“Dugdale, in his History of Embanking, observes that in making
several-channels for draining in the isle of Axholm, great
numbers of oak, fir, and other trees were found in the moor.
The fir trees lay at the depth of between four and five feet, but
the oaks were but little more than three feet beneath the soil.
They were discovered lying near their roots, which “still stand as
they grew,” that is, in firm earth below the moor, and the
bodies, for the most part, northwest from the roots, not cut
down with axes, but burnt asunder, somewhat near the ground,
as the ends of them, being coaled, do manifest. The oaks were
lying in multitudes, and of an extraordinary size, being five
yards in compass, and sixteen yards long; and some smaller of
a greater length, with a good quantity of acorns and small nuts
near them.” Similar discoveries have been made in the fen near
Thorney; in digging the channel north of Lynn, called Downham
Eau; and in many other places.”
testbankfan.com