Skip to content

[TASK] Move getAllValues() to CSSBlockList #1240

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 10, 2025
Merged

Conversation

JakeQZ
Copy link
Collaborator

@JakeQZ JakeQZ commented Apr 10, 2025

Also add unit tests for this method.

Part of #994. Relates to #1230.

@JakeQZ JakeQZ added testing PRs/issues adding additional tests only, or primarily testing-focused refactor For PRs that refactor code without changing functionality labels Apr 10, 2025
@JakeQZ JakeQZ requested a review from oliverklee April 10, 2025 00:30
@JakeQZ JakeQZ self-assigned this Apr 10, 2025
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 10, 2025

Coverage Status

coverage: 56.126% (+1.5%) from 54.658%
when pulling e3a9af9 on task/move-getallvalues
into 0c94d6e on main.

@JakeQZ
Copy link
Collaborator Author

JakeQZ commented Apr 10, 2025

Some of the tests may belong in 'functional' rather than 'unit'. IDK. Other similar tests have been added as 'unit'.

@JakeQZ JakeQZ force-pushed the task/move-getallvalues branch from 47515c8 to e3a9af9 Compare April 10, 2025 01:10
Also add unit tests for this method.

Part of #994.  Relates to #1230.
@JakeQZ JakeQZ force-pushed the task/move-getallvalues branch from e3a9af9 to 2a59cc7 Compare April 10, 2025 01:29
@oliverklee oliverklee merged commit d9137fd into main Apr 10, 2025
@oliverklee oliverklee deleted the task/move-getallvalues branch April 10, 2025 08:04
JakeQZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
JakeQZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 11, 2025
JakeQZ added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2025
oliverklee pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 12, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
refactor For PRs that refactor code without changing functionality testing PRs/issues adding additional tests only, or primarily testing-focused to-backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants